Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2020 09 09

Home Browse Search

Open Space Advisory Board Minutes May 13, 2020 Page 6 of 7 Peter -Makes a motion that OSAB support proposal as submitted. With a specific finding of affirmative answers to questions 1, 2, and 3. Thomas seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Questions in Power Point Include: Is a buffer appropriate and beneficial in this location given proximity to anticipated Open Space dedication to the north of Campus Drive? 2. Is there benefit to the City by setting aside this land when considering a waiver request for additional height? 3. Does OSAB desire access through the site connecting to other anticipated trail networks? 4. Any other comments for consideration by Planning Commission and City Council? David -A discussion item to continue: David would like to understand Section B- level of density, where did 500,000 sq. ft. come from? What does this mean for overall horizontal or vertical footprint? Lisa -overall density has not been approved. 500,000 sq. ft. has remained the same throughout the application and buildings roughly of this height. General discussion regarding height, including some pros and cons. People on east side of parcel B will be affected. Helen- A discussion item to continue: How will conservation easement work on the 7 acres regarding public access and potential ownership by the City? Lisa- will carry that message forward to the developer. 9. 7:40 pm Discussion Item: Preparation of OSAB Annual Update Materials for City Council in Lieu of the OSAB & City Council Study Session (20 Minutes) Helen- The Study Session with City Council in May has been canceled because of COVID-19. Helen, Laura, Bob Muckle, Ember, and Nathan met together to talk about Open Space acquisition and operational recommendations. Helen wanted to share these recommendations with the current board. If approved by the board these recommendations will be shared with City Council. Helen reviewed the packet material with the board. Jessamine -On goals for 2020 we have Warembourg Fishing Pond Master Plan but not the Cottonwood Master Plan. We have two OSAB members appointed to the Cottonwood park task force so we should add it to goals. Add to section 2 of Natural Resources. Approved by the board.