Laserfiche WebLink
is or will be public. However, the analysis that Vranesh & Raisch <br />provided is privileged and confidential. Councilmember Lipton then stated <br />a concern on how privileged and confidential information could be <br />discussed in a public meeting and asked what our boundaries are. Mr. <br />Cotton-Baes responded by saying this doesn't violate the open meetings <br />law. Mr. Cotton-Baes continued with saying the contract will be provided <br />in the packet for Council on October 6, 2020. Mr. Peterson confirmed it <br />will be attached to the Resolution. Mayor Stolzmann asked if the City can <br />approve the agreement without committing to the Group Financing. Then <br />stated she's not sure we have enough information to commit to the Group <br />Financing. Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Maloney asked with the <br />transfer of the Allotment how does that process work. Mr. Johnson <br />described and referred to paragraph 5.2 of the Allotment Contract that <br />addresses this. Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Maloney asked if we are <br />doing Group Financing or City Financing how do you transfer the debt <br />obligation. Mr. Johnson explained that everything is proportional under <br />the contract. You are either a cash or loan Allotee and that is proportional <br />to what your Allotment interest is and gave an example of transfers. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Maloney said, it sounds like you are <br />saying there is no prescribed method in this agreement but leaves it open <br />for negotiation. Mr. Johnson confirmed. Mr. Peterson added that this is <br />the intent of getting Northern into the process so they can either approve <br />or not approve. Not necessarily by adding hurdles or impediments on but <br />just so they have a seat at the table if an entity would want to transfer. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Maloney continued by asking about <br />Section 5.3 regarding the default. He asked given that we are a minor <br />player in this where there are larger partners; if one of them defaults then <br />we can assume a percentage of whoever defaults therefore that would <br />increase our share/obligation. Mr. Johnson said that is correct and <br />explained there is a number of safety nets and fall backs to make sure <br />that doesn't happen. He continued discussing the default procedure and <br />stated the Capital Defaults and Operating Defaults are different. There is <br />a one year cure period for default provision in the contract that allows time <br />for public entities to negotiate their sale or transfer of their Allotment to <br />avoid the drastic consequence of a final default under the contract. <br />Councilmember Lipton asked if there is an option for prepayment or <br />defeasance of the debt. Mr. Manire replied that we don't know what the <br />repayment option participants will have yet. He went on to explain a <br />scenario he's familiar with where the participants would need consent <br />from the authority to prepay which may not be economical for the <br />participants at the time. He advised the elected folks to anticipate that <br />some kind of consent requirement for prepayment would be required by <br />the Sub -District and said that the prepayment is usually distinguished at <br />the time you deliver the funds and defeasance occurs when you pay in <br />advance. Mr. Johnson confirmed that the contract does not have any <br />specific provisions regarding those terms on debt operating. We don't <br />know yet and will be the topic of future meetings with the participants and <br />Windy Gap Firming Enterprise. Councilmember Lipton asked at what <br />5 <br />