My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 10 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2020 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 10 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 8:52:35 AM
Creation date
10/15/2020 11:11:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/21/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The proposal also includes a new gravel driveway leading to a concrete pad and the garage. <br />The zoning ordinance does not have specific surface requirements for a driveway and allows <br />gravel driveways that are a "durable dust free surface maintained adequately for all weather <br />use." The location of the driveway cut does not meet the minimum 30' off -set standard from <br />South Boulder Road, but the City's Public Works department has approved the proposed <br />driveway location as an exception. The exception is consistent with other driveways in <br />Scenic Heights. <br />REVIEW CRITERIA: <br />The BOA has authority to grant or deny a variance request based on the review criteria <br />found in Municipal Code Sections 17.48.110.B.1-6. Following is staff's analysis of the criteria <br />with recommended findings on each. <br />1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions such as irregularity, <br />narrowness or shallowness of lot, or exceptional topographical or other physical <br />conditions peculiar to the affected property. <br />Staff finds the subject lot is 30 feet narrower than the 100-foot minimum lot width requirement <br />and 4,177 sq. ft. smaller than the 12,000 sq. ft. minimum lot area requirement, resulting in a <br />unique physical condition of the property. In addition, the property is on a corner lot and has <br />a larger street -side setback of 30' compared to a standard side -year setback of 5' for interior <br />lot lines. The house was also constructed on the south side of the lot limiting the ability to <br />build a garage and shed with adequate access on this side of the property where the side <br />setback for accessory structures is only 5'. Staff finds the proposal meets this criterion. <br />Figure 4. Accessory Building Envelope I IU <br />71 .. 1� 4 a c_ <br />as' LOT 1 a <br />LOT 8 C <br />164 J.,v 7.6' a <br />o ONE—STORY i d e a BR CK W/ I n <br />EASEMENT 10.0' <br />a 40 ft < a < 107t <br />3 16 <br />BRICK <br />Allowed Accessory <br />Building Area <br />^1 ^I 5' EASEMENT (PLAT) <br />WEST 110' t <br />LOT 7 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.