My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 10 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2020 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 10 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 8:52:35 AM
Creation date
10/15/2020 11:11:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/21/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 19, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Brian Deneau, 601 Johnson Street <br />Deneau mentions that the existing roof has not been removed. He then introduces <br />himself and his wife and discusses why they are requesting this variance. <br />Board Questions of Applicant: <br />Koepke asks if they knew what permits were pulled for their property and who is liable if <br />work was done without a permit. <br />Deneau says that he was surprised that they needed a variance when the structure was <br />already there. He says that he did not talk to the previous owner about the lack of <br />permit. He says that he asked the same question himself but has decided to just move <br />forward in order to get this approved. <br />Cooper mentions that in the design, the new roof appears to be going over the existing <br />roof. How does that affect the existing roof? <br />Stewart says that that design is not an uncommon one. We had a structural engineer <br />review the design so structurally it will be stable. Regarding maintenance and the <br />structure, there are no issues with that. <br />Public Comment <br />None heard. <br />Summary and request bV Staff and Applicant: <br />None heard. <br />Discussion by Board: <br />Stuart says that he thought it was an excellent report and believes this is <br />straightforward. <br />Leedy agrees with Stuart and believes it meets all six criteria. <br />Mihaly agrees and believes it meets all six criteria. <br />Cooper agrees with the other board members. <br />Ewy agrees with the other board members as well. <br />Koepke agrees and believes it meets all six criteria. <br />Motion is made by Stuart to approve 601 Johnson Street's request for a variance from <br />the Johnson Meadows Planned Unit Development to allow a 10' rear setback where 20' <br />is required to allow construction of a deck cover. Motion is seconded by Leedy. Roll call <br />vote. <br />Name <br />Vote <br />Karen Cooper <br />Yes <br />John Ewy <br />Yes <br />James Stuart <br />Yes <br />Mark Koepke <br />Yes <br />Jessica Leedy <br />Yes <br />Jonathan Mihaly <br />Yes <br />Motion passed/failed: <br />Pass <br />Motion passes 6-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.