My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2020 06 25
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2020 06 25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2020 10:30:52 AM
Creation date
11/12/2020 10:30:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/25/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 25, 2020 <br />Page 6 of 24 <br /> <br />• General Development Plan Conditions <br />o Lower transmission poles adjacent to Rockcress Drive <br />o Address outstanding public works comments on the drainage and utility <br />plan <br />o Add a note to the GDP requiring each PUD application to demonstrate <br />acceptable roadway capacity before the development can proceed <br />o Require authorization on the intersection improvements outside of the city <br />o Add a GDP requirement on concurrent employment and commercial <br />development with residential development <br />• Concurrency Requirements <br />o 600 Units of residential development on Parcel A are allowed with the first <br />phase of corporate campus development on Parcel B. All phases of the <br />residential development allowed on Parcel A following completion of all <br />phases of corporate campus development on Parcel B <br />o Limit residential development on Parcels C and D to 300 units until <br />1,500,000 sq. ft. of commercial development, inclusive of 25,000 sq. ft. of <br />retail development is achieved in the GDP Planning Area <br /> <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff: <br />Diehl mentions that the traffic study shows daily trips at the full build out would be <br />27,000. Where are we today in terms of daily trips? <br /> <br />Zuccaro asks for Rich Fulmer, the city’s engineering consultant, or Public Works to <br />answer this question because he does not have that data available to him. <br /> <br />Zuccaro gives an answer from one the commissioner’s earlier questions to Bise. He <br />says the average annual surplus would cover a third of the existing city debt service <br />payments. <br /> <br />Fulmer says that the applicant provided a traffic study that mentions it would be 9,000 <br />trips per day to upwards of approximately 25,000 trips per day. That will be spread out <br />through all hours of the day and there are four enter/exit locations for vehicles for this <br />development. He mentions that the traffic will be distributed and is not all in one <br />location. <br /> <br />Diehl states that the 27,000 trips are supposed to reference the traffic coming in and <br />out of the area versus an additional 27,000 trips in and around Louisville. Is there any <br />way to quantify the increase of traffic in Louisville? <br /> <br />Fulmer says that as traffic engineers, we try to concentrate on a specific roadway <br />intersection, but you are adding those 27,000 trips in Louisville. <br /> <br />Moline asks how the capacity of Highway 36’s interchange compares to McCaslin <br />Blvd’s interchange. <br /> <br />Fulmer says he is unsure if he can do a very good comparison, but mentions that <br />improvements will need to be made at that interchange at some time. There have not <br />been studies to determine what those improvements will be. That interchange will be at
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.