My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2020 07 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2020 07 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2020 10:35:22 AM
Creation date
11/12/2020 10:35:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
7/9/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 09, 2020 <br />Page 15 of 17 <br /> <br />Howe says in regards to what Commissioner Moline said, he mentions that he read 86 <br />emails for this proposal and only one of those emails was in favor of this. The <br />community as a whole does not want this to happen so how could this be an <br />appropriate relationship to the surrounding area. <br /> <br />Moline says he was referring to the marijuana use approval from 2019 and that process <br />of going through public hearing, not the community involvement on this specific <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Brauneis mentions that any commercial site this close to residential will have concerns <br />and challenges regarding traffic, lighting, and noise. In this case, the applicant has <br />addressed those issues with better design standards than they were required to. This <br />project has come forward with a proposal that is much better off than one we could <br />receive 6-8 months from now. <br /> <br />Diehl moves and Brauneis seconds a motion to approve Resolution 5, Series 2020 <br />with staff’s recommended condition. <br /> <br />Motion passes 5-2 by a roll call vote. <br />Name Vote <br />Chair Steve Brauneis Yes <br />Vice Chair Tom Rice Yes <br />Keaton Howe No <br />Ben Diehl Yes <br />Jeff Moline Yes <br />Dietrich Hoefner Yes <br />Debra Williams No <br /> <br />Motion passed/failed: Passed <br /> <br />Agenda Item B: Project 321 (Medtronic) Preliminary and Final Planned Unit <br />Developments Continued from June 25, 2020 <br />• A request for approval of a preliminary and final PUD to allow the construction of <br />a 506,000 sf office building and associated site improvements on property that is <br />part of the proposed ConocoPhillips Campus General Development Plan, 1st <br />Amendment (Redtail Ridge), located northwest of US 36 and Northwest Parkway <br />and southeast of S. 88th Street and Campus Drive. (Resolution 6, Series 2020) <br />o Applicant: Ryan Companies <br />o Case Manager: Lisa Ritchie, Senior Planner <br /> <br />Rice asks if the commissioners have any disclosures they need to make in regards to <br />this agenda item. <br /> <br />Hoefner discloses that he will not participate in this agenda item due to a conflict of <br />interest. <br /> <br />Williams discloses to the commissioners that her husband works for Medtronic, but that <br />he would not be working at the proposed Medtronic building location. She believes this <br />will not affect her voting because neither she nor her husband will have any financial <br />gain from this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.