My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 11 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 11 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2020 11:17:41 AM
Creation date
11/16/2020 10:24:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/16/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALTERATION CERTIFICATE CRITERIA AND STANDARDS ANALYSIS: <br />Sec. 15.36.120. - Criteria to review an alteration certificate. <br />A. The commission shall issue an alteration certificate for any proposed work on a designated <br />historical site or district only if the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or <br />adversely affect any architectural or landscape feature which contributes to its original historical <br />designation. <br />B. The commission must find the proposed alteration to be visually compatible with <br />designated historic structures located on the property in terms of design, finish, material, scale, <br />mass and height. When the subject site is in an historic district, the commission must also find <br />that the proposed alteration is visually compatible with characteristics that define the district. For <br />the purposes of this chapter, the term "compatible" shall mean consistent with, harmonious with, <br />or enhancing to the mixture of complementary architectural styles, either of the architecture of <br />an individual structure or the character of the surrounding structures. <br />C. The commission will use the following criteria to determine compatibility: <br />Criteria and Standards <br />Meets <br />Evaluation <br />Criteria? <br />1. The effect upon the general historical <br />Yes <br />The proposed work, including <br />and architectural character of the structure <br />structural changes to the front facade, <br />and property. <br />replacement windows, and siding <br />repair and replacement will enhance <br />the historic architectural character of <br />the structure. The front porch and <br />porch roof, while prominent, removes <br />the bay window and provides a more <br />compatible element in relation to the <br />historic portions of the structure. <br />2. The architectural style, arrangement, <br />Yes <br />The proposed changes improve the <br />texture, and material used on the existing <br />architectural style, texture and <br />and proposed structures and their relation <br />materials and provide compatibility <br />and compatibility with other structures. <br />with the existing original structure. <br />The use of metal roof on the covered <br />porch helps distinguish this element <br />since it is not historic, but aids in <br />removal of the non -historic bay <br />window with a more compatible form <br />and material. <br />3. The size of the structure, its setbacks, <br />N/A <br />No changes to size, setbacks, or <br />its site, location, and the appropriateness <br />location are proposed. <br />thereof, when compared to existing <br />structures and the site. <br />4. The compatibility of accessory <br />N/A <br />structures and fences with the main <br />structure on the site, and with other <br />structures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.