My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 11 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 11 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2020 11:17:41 AM
Creation date
11/16/2020 10:24:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/16/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />19 October 2020 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />Haley revisited some of the benefits and criteria of the preservation program. <br />Aglietti stated that she was not trying to speak out against demolishing the current structure. <br />She was more interested in starting a conversation about historic districts to protect the <br />structures that are already landmarked. <br />Haley noted that the historic context of the street was important, as well, and this area had a lot <br />of homes that had retained their architectural integrity. <br />Haley summarized that the structure met the requirements regarding age, architectural integrity, <br />social history, and the Commission did not have enough information to judge the structural <br />integrity. Haley appreciated the discussion, and she thought that it sounded like the applicant <br />had already made some decisions but she encouraged him to get the assessment. The house <br />met the landmarking criteria and should have a 60-day stay. <br />Dunlap moved to accept the staff recommendation to place a 60-day stay on the demolition <br />request for the house. Parris seconded. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. <br />Dunlap moved to approve the demolition of the garage. Parris seconded. Motion passed <br />unanimously by roll call vote. <br />833 JEFFERSON: A request for a Preservation and Restoration Loan in the amount of <br />$100,000 from the Historic Preservation Fund (Resolution 24, Series 2020). <br />Commissioner Keller recused himself. <br />Selvoski presented the request for the recently landmarked home at 833 Jefferson. She <br />explained that under Resolution 4, Series 2014, applicants can apply for loans for rehabilitation <br />projects and she noted that the Historic Structure Assessment for the property had been <br />completed before landmarking. <br />Selvoski described the projects in the application, which included: <br />Structural: Install structural beams. <br />Mechanical: Update mechanicals. <br />Sewer: Repair sewer line. <br />Drainage/Grading: Install drainage system and grade for water drainage. <br />Roofing: Replace roof and gutters. <br />Siding: Install new wood sheathing, insulation, and siding on existing damaged or missing <br />siding. <br />Doors/Windows: Add historically appropriate windows. <br />Porch: Repair porch and columns. <br />Selvoski explained that the Commission had approved an Alteration Certificate under <br />Resolution 7, Series 2020 at the time the home was landmarked, which covered the requested <br />projects. Selvoski described the various financial amounts in the application, including the total <br />request and the interest rate, which corresponded with the requirements as laid out in the Code. <br />Staff recommended approval of Resolution 24, Series 2020 for a $100,000 loan and a $400 <br />loan processing fee. <br />C! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.