Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION 94, SERIES 2020 <br />DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 2020 PAGE 4 OF 6 <br />anchor the existing wood walls and reinforce the metal barriers, but there would still be <br />a great deal of workaround since concrete barriers would block each intersection and <br />could not be easily moved to plough snow. The Council may wish to consider if the DBA <br />could assume some or all of the cost for contractual snow removal. <br />Notice and Engagement <br />In June, prior to the official closure of Main Street, and then again in August when there <br />was the consideration to extend the closure, letters were sent to residents and <br />businesses in the surrounding area. Based on the timing of this discussion, that level of <br />notification was not feasible. Staff did share the planned special meeting with residents <br />and businesses through e-news, e-blasts, website calendar, and social media. <br />Staff does not feel we have a complete understanding of the business viewpoints. More <br />restaurants may support winter outdoor dining due to capacity restrictions than did at <br />the end of September or beginning of October. Staff conducted a survey of restaurants <br />in early November and it showed that there will likely be some who do not wish to <br />participate. Staff has surveyed other Main Street businesses about the potential impact <br />of a much longer closure. For the Small Business Season campaign underway, staff <br />proposed offering grab-n-go parking spots to retailers as well as restaurants. It will not <br />be possible to provide these spots directly in front of any Main Street business if the <br />closure remains in place, though staff could place them for businesses on Front Street <br />or on the east -west streets that remain open. <br />Staff is also aware there have been resident concerns about the increased <br />neighborhood traffic that results from the closure. It is likely that if the closure extends, <br />RTD will continue to use LaFarge Avenue as its alternate route. As the DBA suggests, <br />there may be some measures to mitigate speeding, but the parking pressure is most <br />likely to affect the surrounding neighborhood and RTD has shown little willingness to <br />create a new detour. <br />Public Safety Concerns <br />The Main Street closure has necessitated close coordination and ongoing <br />communications among staff as well as with other affected entities. Both Police and the <br />Fire District worked on the initial closure planning and consented to the significant <br />restriction a full street closure posed on their life safety services. In light of considering a <br />further extension, staff reached out to both Police and Fire. They appreciate the <br />especially difficult times for local businesses and have agreed to continue working <br />cooperatively, but they did share concerns from a public safety perspective. <br />Primarily, concerns shared include: code requirement for 20' access in front of buildings <br />for fire attack and fire sprinkler support; alleys lack 20' access, conflict with power lines, <br />are further from sprinkler connections, and many times blocked by delivery vehicles; <br />downtown buildings pose unique fire hazards because of age, proximity, and lack of <br />sprinklers; and a full closure limited use of ladder truck and additional fire apparatus. <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />