BOA Variance Case 1975-12_1032 Lincoln Ave_DENIED

Home Browse Search

• 0 March lh, 1975 Case #12 -- March 14, 1975 7:30 P.M. _ .-.....7 r 1 �l' ly 0•„a7f i yzy.: Laird E. Rippeth 1041 Lincoln Louisville, Colorado - 80027 VARIANCE: dish to split lots and build new house. Lots 9-10-11-12 El'_ 4 - Capitol Hill. Reouest Variances as necessary to divi:6e the above described property into 2 (two) plots to allow construction of a residence on the anproximate west 2 of the present property. A discrintion of the property, worked up by Mr —Stephen, showing the approximate Tenth and width of lot and approximate setbacks, is a part of these minutes, and was read at the hearing. • There was considerable discussion about the ordinance calling for 25 ft. from the alley. It. was noted the ordinance call for 25ft. set back from public right of way. It was established by a question from Mr. Bob Ross, that the house would be a two (2) story frarehouse. A in depth discussion about the 25 ft. setback off the alley was held, acco;noanied with a blackboard drawing showing what the ordinance calls for. The variance sought for here is to reduce this 25 ft. to 6 ft. It was pointed out by Mr. Ernie Marinelli that the applicant wanted to sub divide this plot into two lots and there would be two principal dwellings. It was noted by Mr. Don Picket, the drawing shows a 22 ft. front yard set- back for the new building fronting on Short Street. This requirement by ordinance should be 25 ft. No variancd asked for on this setback. Mr. Mel Stephen stated this was just on approximation and no variance needed. Mr. Don Picket wanted closer figures to the size of the house. Mr. Laird Rinpeth stated the size of the house could change according to the variance granted, but the size would be approximately 32ft. X 48 ft. with approximately 1,536'. 1,326t1in the existing house. Reason for wanting to build, is because the back lot is nothing but a :reed patch, and no renters would take care of it. The new house would be for annlica_nts son. P { It was brought uo by Mr. Mel Stephen in answer to Mr. Don Ross'squestion, that Mr.-. Laird Rinpeth had been denied a building permit, by him and :riot the