My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOA Variance Case 1979-01_Non-Conforming Use - Interpretation
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
1974-1998 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
1979 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
1979 BOA Case Files
>
BOA Variance Case 1979-01_Non-Conforming Use - Interpretation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2024 8:03:20 AM
Creation date
1/20/2021 1:31:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Doc Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes- page 1 <br />July 19, 1979 <br />BOARD OF APPEALS AND ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING <br />Roll Call: Bob Ross, absent, Don Picket, Bob Davies, Don Ross, <br />Frank Velasquez, Gil Reed. <br />Davies: This notice is hereby given of a Public Hearing will <br />be held before the City of Louisville, Board of Appeals and <br />Zoning Adjustment, to consider the application of Lbne Pine, <br />Builders Inc'. P.O. Box 1212, Boulder, Colorado, to vary the <br />provisions of the Zoning Ordinance so as to permit the reduction <br />of the rear yard setback from the required 25 feet to 21 feet <br />zero inches on a residence within the City of Louisville, Colorado <br />known as 655 W. Hawthorne Street, owner, Lone Pine Builders Inc. <br />And is more particulary described as Lot 29, Mesa Point Subdivision.' <br />And all persons in any manner interested in this proposed variation <br />to the City of Louisville Zoning Ordinance are requested to attend <br />the Public Hearing and we're glad that you are here. You have <br />requested, I understand there are troubles, that there are people <br />who are not in favor of this property being set back. I would like <br />to invite anyone who .has .anything to say on this in the negative, <br />please rise. <br />My name is Jack Knott, and I live at 641 Hawthorne, property adjacent <br />to the property in question, I have objections to this particular <br />setback, my message is very simple. From my own personal property <br />standpoint, it is a view obstructing structure, and it is also in <br />violation of the convenance in that particular area. There are also <br />some other people present at this meeting who are from that area, and <br />we feel like the convenance of the area should be enforced, and that. <br />the codes should be enforced. <br />Davies: Thank you, now someone else. <br />Mr. Chairirtan, Don Ross here, one question, is it Mr. Knott? <br />Knott: Yes. <br />Ross: You said something about a view obstructing a view, could you <br />explain that a little bit further to us please? <br />Knott: I can illustrate it for you, I have some photographs here. <br />(Mr. Knott showed some photographs of the house and view obstruction. <br />This is the view past the rear of my house. <br />Davies:. This picture in particular is the east end of your house? <br />Knott: From theeast to the west <br />Davies: Thank you. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.