My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2021 02 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2021 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2021 02 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2021 9:46:15 AM
Creation date
2/17/2021 3:01:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/19/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Economic Vitality Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 15, 2021 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />alternatives to consider. He emphasized that some group representing the <br />business voice should exist. <br />Barbara Butterworth, Secretary for the BRaD Committee, said that there is a <br />very narrow business voice that needs to be broadened. She expressed <br />support that business representatives on the EVC might be one solution. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Maloney said the solution is meant to be a step forward and <br />that the EVC has been successful in serving its purpose and bringing <br />recommendations and programs to Council in a timely manner. He agreed that <br />the business community is not being cut-out of decision -making. He indicated <br />he was not interested in a merger of the EVC and BRaD and that he also did <br />not desire to defer this decision. He suggested the EVC in its current formation <br />with a standing group of business representatives as a solution. <br />Mr. Oberholzer stated it would be important to determine what happens to the <br />work that BRaD performs if there is only a standing group of representatives. <br />Councilmember Leh engaged in a dialogue about how representatives would be <br />selected. He said it was fundamental to consider who represents the business <br />community as well as how that community is defined. He questioned whether <br />businesses would be interested in participating if they did not have a voting <br />membership. <br />Chair Dickinson, with Mr. Oberholzer, discussed how voting would influence <br />participation. It was suggested that there would be two to four business <br />representatives, but those would not include the Chamber of Commerce or <br />Downtown Business Association (DBA). The Chamber and DBA should <br />determine their own representatives and participate as a means of engaging on <br />important issues. <br />The Committee discussed how the particular work items might influence the <br />businesses that should serve as representatives as well as how to recruit <br />businesses and handle an application process. While members felt it would be <br />helpful to have businesses with interests in particular policy decisions <br />participate, they also discussed the importance of having some continuity for <br />ongoing Committee work. Members considered that possibly business <br />representatives could have shorter terms, like a year, so the appointments were <br />more targeted to planned policy discussions. <br />Councilmember Leh and Chair Dickinson discussed the possibility for a <br />"business advisory council" that would not be a public body. Businesses could <br />act on their own to create a voice that is outside City control. <br />Chair Dickinson and Mayor Pro Tern Maloney then reviewed potential <br />membership numbers and how the future EVC would or would not look like past <br />Agenda Packet P. 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.