Laserfiche WebLink
None. <br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />25 January 2021 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA <br />NEW BUSINESS — PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS <br />832 Parkview Street: A request to find probable cause for a landmark designation to allow for <br />funding of a historic structure assessment and a request to demolish the principal structure at <br />832 Parkview Street. <br />• Applicant: Marty Beauchamp <br />• Owners: Joe Manning and Peryl Cain <br />• Staff: Lisa Ritchie, Senior Planner <br />Ritchie shared the current condition of the structure and its additions. Ritchie stated that the <br />principal structure was constructed in 1935, meeting the criteria that landmarks must be at least <br />50 years old. Staff found that the structure was an early to mid -twentieth century frame <br />residential structure, retains its original facade, and represents a historic growth pattern in <br />Louisville. Staff recommended a finding of probable cause for landmarking 832 Parkview, <br />making the structure eligible for Historic Structure Assessment funds. <br />Ritchie also shared the criteria for demolition. While staff found that the structure was eligible for <br />landmarking, the projected cost of restoration and repair included drainage issues that have <br />likely caused damage to the foundation and have caused seepage into the basement. She <br />noted that the structure was also close to the west property line, making alterations to the house <br />difficult. Staff recommended approval of the HSA to help determine if a whole new foundation <br />would be required for the structure. Staff recommended a 120-day stay to provide reasonable <br />time to conduct an HSA and evaluate preservation options. <br />Marty Beauchamp of Red Pencil Architecture, 1098 West Willow Street in Louisville, stated that <br />he had been working with the homeowners for several months anticipating that it would be a <br />remodel and addition project until their contractors pointed out the issues with the basement and <br />the foundation. Beauchamp noted that the sons' rooms were in the basement, where there was <br />a 6'6" basement height, which was not up to code, and that the egress windows were also not <br />compliant. The different options that had been considered were cost -prohibitive and the <br />proximity to the western property line limited what was possible with the egress in the <br />basement. After considering other options, they decided to change directions and demolish the <br />home. <br />Joe Manning, 832 Parkview, stated that he and his family had moved to Louisville three years <br />ago and shared that his two sons were in local schools and his wife was a yoga instructor in <br />Louisville. He stated that they had experienced flooding and mold in the basement. For a period <br />time, their older son had a negative reaction to the mold. They looked into what to do with the <br />house and the feedback they had gotten was that the setup with the foundation made it really <br />difficult and that remodeling and rebuilding was the right approach. <br />Klemme asked if the two -foot side setback on the west side would put the egress right on the <br />property line. <br />Beauchamp replied that a compliant window well would need to be three feet deep, meaning <br />that they could not build one big enough regardless with the current placement of the structure. <br />01A <br />