Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />DATE <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />emergency reserve funds should be set aside each year, and suggested 20 <br />percent. A comment was made that now is an appropriate time to update, in <br />spirit of the ballot issue. <br /> <br />Board members discussed the HPC's recommendation of expenditures. As far <br />as recommendations for variances, the variances do have to go through the <br />Planning Commission. There is a possibility to discuss in joint session. Staff <br />discussed the process with HPC. Staff emphasized the need to maintain clarity <br />of the commission and the board responsible. Exigent reserve funds will be <br />limited the first year. Whether or not there should be allocation between <br />residential and commercial is a concern; as there are differentials in costs. A <br />smaller amount of money could impact more properties. A point of discussion is <br />that the HPC would re-evaluate after one year. At this time there is not a <br />benchmark or existing program to exemplify. The commission members <br />discussed the need of allocation the first year. The tax is novel and a model for <br />historic preservation communities. There are examples to follow for purchase <br />and re-sale as ways to preserve landmark properties. Public and private <br />partnerships are all mechanisms that have been implemented. The HPC should <br />consider rules for acquiring a property. A question was raised, "Once you have <br />fixed the landmark property, what is the value of that property?" A HPC <br />representative stated, as a residence the value increases. The focus of Board <br />members is the value of commercial property. The different concerns could be <br />sorted through. The program would need to be run by a publiclprivate <br />partnership. Another option to bring to the table is to consider if the interface is <br />affordable with these little homes to preserve. Some of these small homes are <br />attractive due to the location, and the market. The HPC needs to be careful to <br />not get off track as to the intention of the HPC, as perceived by voters. The <br />commission wants to stay within those limits. The commission does represent <br />the desires of the City residents, and the City Council was pleased with the <br />feedback. A positive outlook on the options helps move the plan forward. <br />Appreciation has been expressed for the hard work of the commission, and that <br />the HPC is proactive early on. City Council would like to see some projects this <br />year, to demonstrate the HPC is being proactive. The topic of eligible residents <br />that would qualify for local land-marking was discussed. The HPC members <br />indicated that there is a new member, as well as no vacancies on the HPC at this <br />time. City Council stated the amount of work put into the work plan was <br />amazing, and provided a plan for future implementation. The plan is ready for <br />legal counsel, with further staff discussion of how the plan will work. <br /> <br />An HPC member wanted to provide an update on a local building the commission <br />is attempting to save. This building is a wonderful opportunity for a preservation <br />project. The location of the property is outside of downtown. The building was a <br />brothellcasino, on Highway 42, and then moved to the North. The building is well <br />preserved, and in good shape. Balfour wants to expand their property, and the <br />building does not integrate into the company's plan. HPC indicated that they <br />needed contacts and interested parties to come forward. HPC would like to have <br />