My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 04 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2021 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 04 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2021 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
4/9/2021 10:44:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/14/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: WORK PLAN <br />DATE: APRIL 14, 2021 PAGE 2 OF 2 <br />a significant budgeting tool. Annually in the fall, the LRC must translate its priorities and <br />anticipated projects into a budget for the following calendar year. The budget document <br />is an important communication tool to Council —setting expectations about how the LRC <br />plans to allocate time and resources. <br />To facilitate a more in-depth discussion on April 14, staff requests that each <br />Commissioner review the Work Plan document with the following questions in mind. <br />Staff will raise these questions during the meeting to gather feedback on recommended <br />changes to the Work Plan; it will be easier to accomplish this in one meeting if <br />Commissioners have prepared some ideas and suggestions. <br />• What questions are there about the projects and priorities currently represented <br />in the Work Plan? <br />o Are there any items you don't understand or require more detail in order to <br />evaluate? <br />Are there any Actions that you feel should be removed, and if so, why? <br />o This would likely focus on items that would not be a priority for the LRC in <br />the next three to five years. Those items can be placed in a "parking lot" <br />but not slated as a priority. <br />What Actions should be added? <br />o Are there new projects or endeavors on which the Commission wishes to <br />endeavor? New Actions or Project Areas would then need to be <br />considered in terms of priority and capacity. <br />After reviewing Commissioner feedback in these areas, the LRC will then assess <br />prioritization. First, the LRC should consider the prioritization of the Project Areas and <br />then within each project area, label each Action as Low, Medium, or High. For example, <br />an Action labeled as "High" within the top Project Area would be the Commission's <br />highest priority. From a capacity standpoint, the number of high priorities, especially in <br />the short-term and mid-term need to be manageable, otherwise there might not be <br />enough focus to bring projects to fruition. Since the Phase I Wayfinding Signage project <br />has been given a high priority, taking on other projects needs to consider that there are <br />still a number of steps and staff time wrapped -up in this commitment. <br />Depending on the length of the discussion on the three questions above, prioritization <br />may be reviewed in April or May. Staff will incorporate the feedback into an updated <br />matrix document for LRC's confirmation. Also, this remains a living document that would <br />appear on each meeting agenda. The next more significant review should be a <br />precursor to the 2022 budget process —so probably in August or September 2021. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Discuss the Work Plan and provide direction to staff. <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br />• Attachment #1: Goals and Work Plan Matrix <br />Agenda Packet P. 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.