My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 05 25
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2021 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 05 25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2021 10:32:15 AM
Creation date
6/2/2021 3:17:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/25/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: EXISTING FUNDS AND CIP BUDGET IMPACTS <br />DATE: MAY 4, 2021 <br />PAGE4OF6 <br />• There are few Transportation investments included in the C-I-P, so other projects <br />could be cut or reduced (such as facility improvements, IT security, golf course, <br />sustainability/energy efficiency, etc. <br />Additional Budget Impacts: <br />If the City moves forward with plans to increase funding for transportation project <br />implementation, additional staff resources are necessary and funding to support them <br />should be incorporated into the funding scenarios. Depending on the package selected, <br />this may include: <br />1 FTE for transportation engineering and project management in Public Works at <br />approximately $150,000 per position, for 3-5 years <br />- 1 FTE for project assistance for capital projects at approximately $100,000 for 3- <br />5 years <br />An estimate for staffing costs is $1,382,000 which includes an estimated $250,000 per <br />year + 5% annual salary increase for a maximum of 5 years. These costs will be <br />allocated similar to the allocation of current engineering costs, to the General Fund and <br />the Capital Projects Fund. <br />In addition, operational costs should be considered for the ongoing maintenance of the <br />projects that are completed. This may include routine maintenance such as snow <br />removal, plowing, pavement/concrete improvements and long terms replacement costs. <br />Estimated costs for ongoing maintenance is approximately $10,000 — 25,000 per year. <br />These costs will also be funded through the General Fund and Capital Projects Fund. <br />Other funding sources: <br />In addition to the Capital Projects Fund, Capital Projects Fund reserves and General <br />Fund reserves, City Council requested additional information about the potential for <br />utilizing Louisville Revitalization funds to support projects that are eligible within the <br />Urban Renewal Area (URA). The LRC plans to review long-term fund projections in <br />June so staff is unable to provide information about the status of reserves and future <br />fund balance at this time. Next steps in June would involve developing updated financial <br />projections for the remaining life of the URA and discussing LRC long-term funding <br />priorities. <br />Staff has received some guidance from the City Attorney regarding the expenditure of <br />funds beyond the life of the Urban Renewal Authority. All funds generated by property <br />tax increment (the main source of LRC funding) remaining in the LRC's special fund <br />must be pledged (not necessarily spent) within the 25-year life of the LRC's TIF <br />provision, which ends in 2032. If the LRC has pledged funds under a TIF agreement or <br />to the repayment of bonds, for example, the LRC could still use property tax increment <br />in the special fund to pay those obligations beyond 2032. However, the LRC won't <br />receive property tax increment beyond the 25-year life of the TIF provision. So any <br />pledge of funds beyond 2032 would need to come out of funds already deposited in the <br />special fund. If Council and the LRC decide to move forward with the use of LRC funds, <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />Agenda Packet P. 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.