Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />Cityo,- <br />Louisville <br />COLORADO • SINCE 1878 <br />LOUISVILLE REVITALIZATION <br />COMMISSION <br />SUBJECT: <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION- DRAFT COOPERATION <br />AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN <br />UNDERPASS IMPROVEMENTS <br />DATE: JUNE 30, 2021 <br />PRESENTED BY: MEGAN E. PIERCE, ECONOMIC VITALITY DIRECTOR <br />SUMMARY: <br />At its June 16, 2021 meeting, the Louisville Revitalization Commission (LRC) reviewed <br />long-term financial projections for the Urban Renewal Area (URA). Commissioners <br />determined there was sufficient discretionary funding in the URA's future to participate <br />in funding underpass improvements from the Transportation Master Plan that City <br />Council is currently considering for implementation. The LRC directed staff to develop a <br />draft Cooperation Agreement to propose to City Council through which the LRC would <br />annually contribute $1.25M to underpass improvements in fiscal years 2023 — 2027 and <br />$1.5M in fiscal years 2028 — 2032. This results in funding of $13.75M over the <br />remaining life of URA. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />On June 17, staff communicated to Council LRC's intent to enter into an agreement to <br />contribute funding. That evening, City Council further considered the program of six <br />potential underpass projects, including updated cost estimates, financial considerations, <br />and possible ballot language. A copy of the June 17 Council meeting materials is <br />included as Attachment #1. <br />Commissioners may also wish to watch a recording of the meeting, which is available <br />on the City's website: https://www.louisvilleco.gov/local-government/meeting-videos. <br />The focus of the June 17 meeting was around the updated underpass concept designs <br />and associated cost estimates. A number of the underpasses were presented with a <br />best, recommended design, but one that may be reduced in scope to meet financial <br />parameters. This means that a number of the cost estimates appearing in the materials <br />are much higher than those previously presented; estimates now also include 50% <br />contingency amounts since projects are still only at a 10% level of design. The Council <br />discussed a balance of design level (an underpass that is a gateway or more utilitarian) <br />but also scaling projects so that more improvements could be constructed. A priority list <br />of projects was determined as well as a targeted ballot amount. Council directed bond <br />counsel and staff to work with language around a $50M bond issuance, which is <br />anticipated would accommodate underpass improvements at the top four of the six <br />prioritized projects, as listed below: <br />Agenda Packet P. 2 <br />