Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2021 07 14

Home Browse Search

aside from a new tax on the ballot. Peter noted that City Council appears to be asking for open space monies and if so, the Bullhead Gulch crossing is the highest priority since there is currently no legal crossing of the railroad tracks between Baseline and South Boulder road. Nathan suggested a motion to prioritize underpasses without other legal action and without getting too specific on projects. Peter supported the underpasses but wanted to prioritize those that did not have alternative means of crossing. Anneliese was concerned that voicing support for this project could be misconstrued to be supporting the use of open space monies. Helen voiced support for the city funding the projects but similarly did not support the use of open space tax monies to do so. After a question from Jessamine, it was confirmed that open space monies are restricted and that further discussion with OSAB would be required for any future allocation. Deb clarified that City Council would seek voluntary contributions from OSAB and other boards such as the revitalization committee. Deb noted that City Council is not looking to drain the whole open space budget for this project. Anneliese noted that she considered a 33% contribution of the OSAB budget, a number that was floated in reference to the revitalization committee, to be draining and that she would not support such a motion. Helen proposed a friendly amendment noting that since there is a precedent of using open space taxes for trail connectivity projects, such as underpasses, that OSAB would need more information before making a more sweeping recommendation regarding funding. Jessamine asked for crossing number 5 to be prioritized but that it did not necessarily need to be improved with an underpass. Charles urged the consideration of the "ok option" first so as not to get trapped in an "underpass or nothing" line of thinking. Nathan noted that public works are looking at cost estimates and the project will never be cheaper than it is now. Charles noted he would support the project. ACTION: After a good deal of wordsmithing, the following motion was made by Peter "OSAB has reviewed City Council's proposal regarding six potential new underpasses and encourages Council to prioritize locations that do not currently have an at -grade crossing. The board further recommends that at -grade crossing be considered in place of underpasses where feasible. The board requests another opportunity to comment on the proposal if the use of open space tax monies is being considered for financing." This motion was seconded by Charles. Unanimously approved. ACTION: Peter moved to adjourn. Charles seconded. Unanimously approved.