My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2021 09 24
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2021 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2021 09 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2021 4:21:17 PM
Creation date
9/20/2021 9:53:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/24/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN ITEM #1-3 <br />DATE: AUGUST 20, 2021 PAGE 2 OF 8 <br />One of the more significant points of negative feedback about the existing program is <br />around the requirement that a business may not sign a lease before being approved for <br />assistance. It generally takes between three to four weeks from completed application <br />to City Council consideration; most of the variation in timeline is due to Council's <br />advanced agenda. If an applicant is already negotiating on a commercial space in <br />Louisville, a three to four week delay could be problematic to securing the space. <br />Councilmembers expressed an interest in more flexibility around this eligibility factor but <br />reaffirmed that philosophically, incentives are still meant to help draw and retain <br />businesses in Louisville, not to reward those that have already selected the community. <br />Staff feels there are two changes that would both create more flexibility without <br />dramatically altering the existing process. First, the program could require that an <br />application must be filed prior to lease signing. Similar to today, staff would simply <br />confirm that a lease has not yet been signed, but would not then prohibit a lease <br />transaction while the agreement for incentives is being prepared. Alternatively, the City <br />could allow a 30 day window between incentive approval and lease signing. Under this <br />structure, applicants could still submit an application after signing a lease, but there <br />would only be 30 days to complete the process. That timeline is generally feasible from <br />our current standards, but does leave the applicant with some risk. <br />Importantly, it would still be a best practice and the most assurance for an applicant to <br />submit and receive approval prior to signing a lease —because then the business has <br />an agreement of the City's obligations already in -hand. However, there are situations <br />where businesses are not aware of our programs at an early enough stage to go <br />through the process. It is most common that smaller businesses miss out on incentives. <br />Staff generally finds corporations and larger businesses are aware of such opportunities <br />or have representatives to pursue them on their behalf. <br />The other option around timeline for approval is that incentive agreements below a <br />certain threshold are permitted to be approved administratively. This would likely be <br />very limited to existing businesses that are moving or expanding and do not have <br />significant tenant improvements and may not be large tax generators. In the current <br />process, staff prepares an estimate and recommendation of incentives and presents it <br />to the City Manager for concurrence before proceeding to City Council. <br />Incentivizinq Outcomes <br />There are several clear themes from the recently adopted Strategic Plan that are helpful <br />to consider for how to align incentives with the outcomes the City hopes to achieve with <br />its work over the next three to five years. Below is a summary of the key themes from <br />staff's perspective, which is then followed by ideas for new or revised incentives —to <br />present a menu of options for the EVC's consideration. <br />• Desire to incentivize the use of existing vacant commercial space, especially <br />spaces that have struggled with vacancy or have vacancies spanning multiple <br />years. <br />Agenda Packet P. 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.