Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13th, 2020 <br />Page 2of9 <br />Haley thanked Mr. Wheeler for the update and noted the importance of public <br />involvement in the process. <br />Dunlap stated that there were specific things that Mr. Wheeler had mentioned that could <br />be taken to Council and added to the building guidelines. <br />NEW BUSINESS — PUBLIC HEARNIG ITEMS <br />917 La Farge Avenue: Landmark, Grant, Alteration Certificate Request <br />Selvoski presented the requests for 917 La Farge, for which the Commission had <br />recently approved a Historic Structure Assessment. 917 La Farge was constructed in <br />1891 and was a one-story wood frame residence with a hip -on -gable roof and a shed <br />roof over the front porch. Changes to the original structure included wrought -iron porch <br />posts and railings, roofing, gutter, and trim replacements; enlarged window openings; <br />replaced windows; and connecting an outbuilding to the main house. These changes <br />were not irreversible, however. The earliest owner of the house was an Italian <br />blacksmith who worked at the local coal mines. The next owners, the Porta family, <br />purchased it around 1921 and owned it for the next 80 years. The property had not <br />been moved and the footprint remained largely the same. <br />Staff recommended approval of Resolution 1, Series 2020 for landmarking, and naming <br />the house the Porta House. <br />Haley and Dunlap noted that there was already a Porta House. <br />Selvoski replied that staff would look into a different name for the house. <br />Selvoski described the work to be done under the alteration certificate, taking the <br />structure back to the way it looked during its period of significance. Staff recommended <br />approval of Resolution 2, Series 2020. <br />Selvoski presented the request for a $40,000 matching grant to cover the work to be <br />done on the house. She described the work to the foundation, crawlspace, floor <br />structure, siding, ornamentation, trim, soffits, windows, doors, and front porch. She <br />noted that there would be electrical work, which was not included in the grant request. <br />She proposed work would cost $86,000 overall. <br />Staff recommends approval of the grant for $5,000 in a landmarking bonus grant and <br />$40,000 matching grant (Resolution 3, Series 2020.) <br />Klemme asked if the siding for the summer kitchen would change and if the summer <br />kitchen was older than 50 years old. <br />Selvoski replied that it would not be changing and the kitchen was older than 50 years. <br />Ulm asked if the summer kitchen was part of the original structure. <br />