Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 24th, 2020 <br />Page5of7 <br />it was on the 1948 Assessor's card so it his historic. Regarding the alteration certificate, <br />the sunroom is slated to be demolished along with the garage to the east. The addition <br />will be built largely to the rear of the property, maintaining most of the historic structure. <br />Based on feedback from the Historic Preservation Commission, the second story <br />addition was scaled back to be less impactful. <br />Dunlap stated that he appreciated the changes to the second story. <br />Michael Talbot Wilt, applicant, 348 S. Jefferson Ave., told the Commission that they're <br />excited about the project and preserving the existing house. <br />Klemme stated that she appreciated that the design does a great job taking direction <br />from the standards from the Secretary of the Interior. <br />Parris stated that the addition doesn't detract from the historic nature of the house. <br />Dunlap appreciates the reuse of original materials on the project. It's an appropriate <br />addition. <br />Keller states that the addition blends seamlessly with the new. <br />Klemme stated that it was an excellent candidate for landmaking based on our <br />requirements. <br />Dunlap made a motion to approve the landmark request for 908 Rex Street and name it <br />the Mancini House. Klemme seconded the motion. Motion approved unanimously by <br />voice vote. <br />Parris made a motion to approve the updated alteration certificate request presented at <br />the meeting on 5/11/2020. Klemme seconded the motion. Motion approved <br />unanimously by voice vote. <br />541 Jefferson Avenue: Probable Cause Determination <br />Selvoski presented the case for probable cause. The house was constructed in 1905 <br />and meets the criteria for age. The house was typical of other homes built at the time in <br />Louisville but has undergone significant changes over time, particularly the addition to <br />the southeast corner of the house, and partially meets the criterial for architectural <br />significance. Selvoski stated that the major renovations to the home were done in 1997 <br />and at that time, the home was relocated on the lot. Due to that, staff feels that the <br />physical integrity of the property is partially met as well. <br />Dunlap questioned if the owner would want to make the additional alterations to the <br />property beyond those recommended by the Historic Structure Assessment. <br />Selvoski clarified that approval of the HSA does not automatically qualify a home for <br />landmarking. <br />