My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2021 02 22
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2021 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2021 02 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2021 2:45:16 PM
Creation date
10/19/2021 8:00:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/22/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
10/19/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />22 February 2021 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />Zuccaro stated that he understood there to be a desire to better catalog and list actual <br />landmarks in addition to reviewing non-landmarked but priority properties. He asked if the <br />Commission was still interested in that. <br />Dunlap replied that he thought that the landmark priorities should not be published beyond the <br />surveys. <br />Zuccaro replied that the Open Space board had a list of desired land but they did not make <br />quasi-judicial decisions about them later on so staff would have to check with the City Attorney <br />on the process. He stated that if the Commission thought it was important to do staff could look <br />at the legal limits. <br />Dunlap replied that he thought it was more of a long-term thing. The more immediate was that <br />the Commission was not quite sure what had been landmarked. General discussion on where to <br />find information on landmarked structures. <br />Dunlap said that the HSA update was probably an easier one but the conservation easement <br />one was probably pretty big. He asked if the historic survey projects required any input from the <br />commission members. <br />Zuccaro replied that there was no input but there would be a final presentation by PaleoWest. <br />Haley asked if PaleoWest had finished the survey and about scheduling the presentation. <br />Zuccaro replied that staff had reviewed the first 50 and the second 50 were under review right <br />now. Bridget Bacon at the Museum was making comments on the second batch. He estimated <br />that it would be done in the next one -three months. Once those were done staff would schedule <br />the presentation for the Commission. <br />Bauer noted that the final presentation was built into the contract and it would be scheduled at <br />the Commission's convenience. <br />Haley stated that Preservation Month was in May and the Commission had not done anything in <br />2020 so it would be great to do something this year. Haley stated that the subcommittee could <br />meet and figure out the priorities. Dunlap said he would send an email to cover what he knows <br />about the outreach subcommittee. <br />Dunlap stated that conservation easement and extraordinary circumstances might need a <br />separate meeting. <br />Zuccaro stated that the grant amounts, grant, and extraordinary circumstances discussions <br />could be tied together. <br />Haley stated that they could start discussions during the regular schedule and then schedule <br />other meetings if needed. <br />Bauer stated that she could fill in the project table and present it to the Commission to give the <br />project list a little more structure. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.