Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN ITEM #14 (CONTINUED) <br />DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2021 PAGE 3 OF <br />The objectives for this Urban Renewal Plan were to: create a retail rich <br />environment where area businesses and residents can be successful; re -tenant or <br />develop the Property; and increase retail activity by encouraging occupancy of the <br />Property. With these goals in mind, one of the powers authorized to the Louisville <br />Revitalization Commission (LRC) through the Plan was that of eminent domain — <br />to eliminate defective or unusual condition of title nonmarketable to prevent the <br />spread of deterioration via property acquisition. It is staff's understanding that the <br />condemnation authority was put in place to address the restrictive covenants rather <br />than with the intent of acquiring any real property. As such, the Urban Renewal <br />Plan did not authorize the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to create a funding <br />source to address the determined blight factors. <br />Condemnation must have a "public use" —essentially eradicating the blight factors <br />that were found in the conditions survey and determined by the City. <br />Condemnation cannot be used to take private property to transfer it to a private <br />entity when the only purpose of the transfer is economic development or tax <br />revenue enhancement. With the property owner's cooperation, the LRC's steps to <br />remove the covenants would include: condemn the fee title to the entire property, <br />receive clear title from the Court in the condemnation proceeding, and then <br />reconvey the property to the owner under a redevelopment agreement. The <br />redevelopment agreement would then address new covenants, use restrictions, <br />and development obligations. <br />Following the Urban Renewal Plan, the LRC and the City released a joint Request <br />for Proposal in 2016 for retail redevelopment of the site. Ultimately, a process to <br />negotiate a Development Agreement for a new retail user was put on hold <br />indefinitely in 2017. Subsequently, the City led the McCaslin Parcel O <br />Redevelopment Study which was completed in January 2019. As noted at the EVC <br />meeting, prior to the 2020 GDP amendment, there was consideration by the <br />property owners to seek zoning changes that would have allowed mixed -use and <br />residential development. There was some Council support for the concept at the <br />time. However, the property owners did not pursue the zoning changes that would <br />have permitted residential development. <br />McCaslin Boulevard was the subject of Small Area Plan adopted by the City in <br />2017. The intent of the plan is to guide public and private investment in the <br />McCaslin Boulevard corridor over a 20 year period —incorporating the west and <br />east sides of the Boulevard from Via Appia Way to US 36. The outcomes of the <br />plan included give major recommendations: 1) Limit allowed height to two stories <br />along McCaslin and adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods; 2) Decrease <br />total allowed development in the area from what existing zoning and regulations <br />would allow; 3) Improve connections for pedestrians, cyclists, and automobiles; 4) <br />Orient development to be more inviting to visitors on foot, on bikes, and in cars; <br />and 5) Develop new public gathering space and access to nearby existing public <br />amenities. <br />Agenda Packet P. 9 <br />