My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2021 03 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2021 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2021 03 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2022 3:30:53 PM
Creation date
2/3/2022 3:25:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
3/11/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
2/3/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 11, 2021 <br />Page 8 of 9 <br />boring could provide additional evidence. That would be an extreme circumstance but <br />there were options. <br />Brauneis invited summations. <br />Zuccaro liked Commissioner Hoefner's addition to the natural grade language. <br />Hoefner restated his language, which would be added to Section 17.8.205, as follows: <br />"the elevation of a lot undisturbed by development, or if the lot has already been <br />developed, redevelopment including the addition of fill, berms, retaining wall, and <br />landscape." <br />Brauneis asked if Director Zuccaro was comfortable with that language. <br />Zuccaro confirmed. <br />Hoefner made a motion to approve Resolution 4, Series 2021, with the amendment of <br />language as stated previously by Commissioner Hoefner. Moline seconded. Motion <br />approved unanimously by roll call vote. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Hoefner requested to add a discussion of the noise and hours downtown to the next <br />agenda that was not too packed. <br />Ritchie stated that the discussion was timely and staff would follow up. <br />Zuccaro stated that the City Council legal committee three years ago studied this issue <br />and looked at a decibel -based noise ordinance for downtown, which had not been <br />moved out of committee. There had been a lot of public comment and staff could bring <br />background on that discussion for a study session. <br />Howe stated that it would be helpful to look at the density of residential areas <br />downtown. <br />Ritchie replied that there were different standards for different areas and it might make <br />sense to do a tiered approach based on context. <br />Williams added that Moxie and Crystal Springs were put in different standards based on <br />being in a transition zone. <br />Zuccaro stated that that was the rationale for Crystal Springs since there hadn't been an <br />opportunity to buffer, but he noted that the Grain Elevator was immediately across the <br />street from residential and they had not had a buffer. <br />STAFF COMMENTS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.