My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2021 05 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2021 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2021 05 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2022 3:31:20 PM
Creation date
2/3/2022 3:26:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/13/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
2/3/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 13, 2021 <br />Page 10 of 10 <br />for the market, though flexibility was still important at this stage. He also explained the concept <br />of linking the industrial with the office to create innovation in the same development. <br />Brauneis asked how they would drive the unified approach to occupancy and tenants. <br />Baukol replied that phasing would help govern the process. <br />Howe asked about the privately -owned common space and if a private landowner could obstruct <br />access. <br />Swisher replied that there was a dedicated trail corridor and then there were other easements <br />that encapsulated those spaces so that would not be a possibility. <br />Howe asked about LEED silver versus gold. <br />Radoff replied that transit connectivity and density points on the LEED scorecard were easier to <br />achieve in a downtown area and that meeting gold standard downtown was doing much the <br />same thing in a more rural or suburban area would get you the silver rating. <br />Howe stated that citizens were concerned about thinking ahead of the curve in terms of <br />sustainability. <br />Brauneis asked how Redtail would affect the traffic and how the site was connected to transit. <br />Bill Fox, North 79th Street in Boulder County, stated that the Northwest Parkway and 36 <br />interchange would become congested over time and at some point it would need to be <br />reconstructed to handle the projected traffic, even if Redtail stays vacant, by the year 2040. <br />Redtail would accelerate that a bit. He noted that it would be difficult to predict how the different <br />elements of the interchange would need to change and when, but it would happen regardless of <br />Redtail. He added that they had been thinking about how to get people to move more efficiently <br />along the corridor. <br />Baukol added that the RTD stop for the Flatiron Flyer was a huge asset and they were working <br />on options including a shuttle and trails, among others, to enable connectivity at that last mile. <br />He noted that the US 36 bike lane was also part of the trail connection goal. <br />Brauneis asked who would work on that and asked for a definition of EV-ready parking. <br />Swisher replied that they would work with a transit organization likely with Metro District funds. <br />Radoff stated that they were using the LEED definition about conduit to parking areas. <br />Brauneis and Vice Chair Rice proposed that the Commission move to continue the hearing and <br />start the next meeting with additional questions of the applicant. Howe motion to continue and <br />Diehl seconded to continue to May 20tn <br />ADJOURN <br />Diehl moved to adjourn. Howe seconded. Meeting adjourned at 10:00 PM. <br />viitt,1/02 7 <br />Chair Steve Brauneis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.