Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 24, 2021 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />St Louis Parish and Bolder Innovation Campus Filing 2 PUD and plat: A request for <br />approval of a PUD to allow a 100,000 sf industrial building and a replat of a portion of <br />Parcel 1, St Louis Parish and Bolder Innovation Campus Filing 1 to create 4 lots <br />(Resolution 9, Series 2021). CONTINUED FROM JUNE 10, 2021. <br />• Applicant: United Properties <br />• Case Planner: Lisa Ritchie, Principal Planner <br />Request to continue to July 8, 2021. <br />Brauneis moved and Diehl seconded a continuance. Motion passed unanimously by roll <br />call vote. <br />The Foundry GDP Amendment: A request for approval of the 7th Amendment to the <br />Takoda General Development Plan to allow up to 59 dwelling units and 15,000 sf of <br />commercial development (Resolution 10, Series 2021). CONTINUED FROM JUNE 10, <br />2021. <br />• Applicant: Brian Bair, Mass Equities <br />• Case Planner: Lisa Ritchie, Principal Planner <br />All public notice requirements met. <br />Williams disclosed that she lived about 100 yards from the property and that would not <br />affect her ability to deliberate. <br />Ritchie described the item and the primary changes to the plan, and stated that the <br />GDP did not authorize construction. She showed the concept plan, which was not <br />analyzed for compliance and was one of many potential development scenarios. The <br />amendment involved community input, a traffic study, density measurements, and a <br />concurrency requirement. Staff had initially recommended denial for Resolution 10 <br />based on concurrency and fiscal policy issues and Ritchie noted that concurrency was <br />not required by Code. <br />Diehl asked if buildings E and F for the previous PUD would be one or two stories. <br />Ritchie replied that Building F had a mix of one and two stories and Building E was a <br />single story. <br />Diehl asked if the Commission had already approved more than one story facing <br />Highway 42. <br />Ritchie replied that approval was already on the books and the policy came in later <br />through the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan. She stated that the GDP did not <br />include a requirement to lower heights down to one story, but it did have 30' provision <br />reduced from 35' currently permitted. <br />Diehl asked about the letters of intent. <br />