Laserfiche WebLink
LL C ity,}f <br />Louisville <br />Planning Commission <br />Staff Report <br />February 10, 2022 <br />ITEM: Emergency Ordinance Addressing Zoning Regulations <br />Affecting Structures Damaged or Destroyed by the <br />Marshall Fire and Authorizing the Zoning Administrator to <br />Reconcile Discrepancies and Facilitate Rebuilding <br />PLANNER: Robert A. Zuccaro, AICP, Director of Planning and Building <br />Safety <br />APPLICANT: Staff Initiated <br />SUMMARY: <br />Staff is presenting for recommendation to City Council an emergency ordinance that <br />provides administrative authority to allow the Zoning Administrator to make <br />interpretations and determinations on zoning standards to reconcile any conflicting <br />provisions or gaps that exist between adopted ordinances and development plans and <br />the standards used for the original development of structures damaged or destroyed by <br />the Marshall Fire. The ordinance would allow the Zoning Administrator to issue <br />summary standards addressing yard, bulk and other dimensional standards consistent <br />with each neighborhoods' established character. Such summaries would become an <br />enforceable and permanent part of each governing development plan for impacted <br />properties. <br />The summary standards would first be based on the City's adopted ordinances and <br />standards within approved development plans, such as Planned Unit Developments <br />(PUDs) and General Development Plans (GDPs) when such standards clearly reflect the <br />established character of each neighborhood. Where conflicting provisions arise that are <br />inconsistent with the as -built character of the neighborhood or there are omissions in <br />regulations so that no controlling provision exists, the Zoning Administrator would <br />determine the applicable standard. Examples of anticipated conflicts or omissions <br />include but are not limited to: <br />• Conflicts in as -built lot coverage and adopted lot coverage standards. <br />• Omissions in GDPs of yard and bulk or height standards and/or reference to <br />applicable underlying residential district to base standards. <br />• Omissions or conflicts in as -built street side -yard setbacks and the underlying <br />zoning or PUD setbacks. <br />• Amended or no longer applicable design standards in development agreements <br />likely relied on in original construction that are not codified or that clearly run with <br />certain parcels of land. <br />• Height calculation methodology for walk -out basements and grading disturbance <br />due to debris removal and site remediation. <br />Fencing design standards. <br />To understand original yard and bulk standards established within a neighborhood, staff <br />will rely on permit records and surveys from the original construction. This may be <br />supplemented by other reliable information including but not limited to County Assessor <br />