My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2021 12 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2021 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2021 12 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:15:47 PM
Creation date
3/3/2022 11:31:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
12/7/2021
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 7, 2021 <br />Page 8 of 12 <br />Mayor Stolzmann proposed interviews as noted in the recommended list as well as <br />adding interviews for Tamar Krantz and all Planning Commission members applying for <br />reappointment She noted that sometimes, it is not best to put an applicant where they <br />want to be, but where they would fit best. <br />Councilmember Brown returned at 8:27 <br />MOTION: Mayor Stolzmann moved to set the interviews as she proposed; seconded by <br />Councilmember Most. <br />Councilmember Dickinson would like to see a balance of new and existing members, but <br />there are instances where there are not enough applicants to fill all vacancies, which <br />means that there isn't a choice but to reappoint standing members. He wondered how <br />term limits would impact boards that don't have enough applicants and agreed that <br />discussion should be done outside of evaluating individuals. <br />VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote. <br />Members agreed to set the start time of the interviews on December 13th at 5:30 p.m. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — COST OF DOING BUSINESS SCORECARD UPDATE <br />Economic Vitality Director Pierce presented the history of the Cost of Doing Business <br />Scorecard as part of the Council's 2021 work plan. It is a comparative effort of Louisville <br />to surrounding communities. Staff conducted research by surveying and locating any fees <br />available online, fees documented in specific code sections or ordinances and by <br />following up with communities directly. Staff surveyed Broomfield, Boulder, Erie, <br />Lafayette, Longmont and Superior with a focus on commercial development fees <br />including water tap fees, sewer fees, wastewater fees, storm water fees, non-residential <br />impact fees and parking improvement fees. The Economic Vitality Committee (EVC) <br />helped select two Louisville developments for comparison. <br />She showed the case study at 824 South Street comparing the cost of doing business for <br />in Louisville to Boulder, Erie, Lafayette, and Longmont. Louisville has the next to highest <br />cost for a small commercial development of this nature. Water tap fee is the highest of <br />any municipality. Louisville only one that has a fire district fee and site improvement fee. <br />Louisville has the lowest storm water and liquor licensing fees. <br />Case study for 609 104th Street; staff found Louisville collect a site improvement fee while <br />others did not. Business/Sales Tax license was not collected by Lafayette or Erie. <br />Lafayette charges an affordable housing fee on commercial development. Boulder <br />charges a Liquor License Occupation Tax and an Excise tax. <br />In the two case studies, Louisville's Cost of Doing Business is within the range of the <br />other communities. It is most similar to Boulder and Longmont for a small commercial <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.