My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2009 05 12
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2009 05 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:38:09 AM
Creation date
6/12/2009 2:00:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6E1
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2009 05 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />May 12, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />Chickens <br /> <br />Staff conducted a survey of jurisdictions and areas in the front range. The current <br />municipal code allows residents to keep up to three ducks, turkeys, or geese if <br />zoned for such use. Chickens are currently not stated in the municipal code. <br /> <br />Discussion centered on the protection of chickens from predators. Ideas <br />suggested included limiting size of pens or square footage per chicken, the <br />guidelines of set-back requirements, and properly fencing chickens. A concern <br />about the noise of roosters was raised. Some jurisdictions require criteria to <br />include maintaining sanitary chicken pens. Committee members asked what the <br />methods are to keep down the odor of chicken coops. Public comments included <br />information on "tractor" methods for moving around chickens - which is good for <br />gardens and lawns. Chickens kept in once place are kept in coops. Chicken <br />manure can be placed in composting piles. A concern is that some yards do not <br />have a large set back that would allow them to raise chickens. Public present <br />discussed the positive aspect of raising chickens is to provide eggs for a family. <br />Typically a minimum of four hens are needed to provide for a single family. Some <br />city ordinances require a secure place or safety enclosures to keep chickens <br />from predators. Set backs for any ancillary structure is currently 10 feet from the <br />back and 5 feet from the sides. <br /> <br />Public comments: <br /> <br />A concern expressed was that chicken coops attract natural predators and will <br />bring coyotes and raccoons into the area. This circumstance could increase the <br />possibility of wild animals in the area becoming a problem for residents with small <br />pets, children, and trash bins kept outside. Further research into the possibility of <br />the increase in wild animals was suggested. Chicken droppings would be a <br />problem if near a neighbor's yard that does not want the chickens. Longmont <br />has thoroughly researched the keeping of chickens; requirements are restrictive <br />and limit the number of chickens to four. If wild animals can be kept from <br />chickens, then predators will not return. A request for guidelines and education <br />about the adequate keeping of chickens was voiced. <br /> <br />Comments by staff: There is a question of how many animals would be allowed <br />per property. Not necessarily the type, rather limiting the total number of animals <br />per lot. The City may have to address the entire issue of animal husbandry in a <br />residential area. A requirement may be needed to keep chickens and coops so <br />many feet from all property lines as not to impose what one neighbor wants over <br />another. A council member commented on the preference for a set-back <br />requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.