My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2009 06 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2009 06 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:00:19 PM
Creation date
6/16/2009 2:14:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAPKT 2009 06 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />some additional safeguards to the occupants, they don't reduce the required fire flow, amount of fire <br />pumps, or personnel required to extinguish the fire. <br /> <br />Currently, the ICC code allows a wood frame structure to be anywhere from 9,000 sq. fL for Type V (B) <br />to 18,000 sq. ft. for Type V (A) before automatic sprinklers are required. This being one of the more <br />common types of construction for small and mid-size businesses, it was picked to be used as one <br />example. <br /> <br />Using this type of construction and an area of 10,000 sq. fl. we can develop a sample of required fire <br />flow. Using the current ICC fire code, it is estimated that the basic fire flow for this structure would be <br />2,750 gpm to provide fire fighting in this sample structure. This demand occurs because a fire could <br />consume contents and possibly structural members before its propagation (fire spread) is interrupted <br />by fire suppression personnel. <br /> <br />A standard hose line for large fires flow is approximately 250 gpm, and when divided into 2,750 gpm <br />equates to eleven hose streams. Generally accepted fire service practice uses a minimum of three <br />firefighters per 250 gpm hose line. 11 hose lines x 3 firefighters = 33 firefighters, plus additional <br />personnel for other jobs. <br /> <br />If the sample structure were to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system the fire flow could be <br />reduced by as much as 50%. It would now require approximately 1,375 gpm instead of2,750 gpm. By <br />using the previously described example, divide 1,375 gpm by 250 which would equal six hose lines. 6 <br />hose lines x 3 firefighters = 18, plus additional personnel for other jobs (e.g., rescue, ventilation, and <br />laddering). This simple analysis identifies that every structure protected by automatic fire sprinklers <br />could reduce the required fire flow and perhaps more importantly, help our volunteer department <br />safely and effectively mitigate a fire in a commercial structure. Moreover, there are additional <br />arguments for reduced manpower for these types of fires. <br /> <br />Currently. NFPA 1710 (standards for organization and fire suppression deployment) requires a <br />minimum of 14 firefighting personnel respond to all initial alarms or residential structure fires. So then <br />it sumds to reason that structures larger than a typical house fire require a significantly larger <br />commitment of resources. Moreover, since the LFD is predominately a volunteer department, it is a <br />challenge to amass the necessary initial resources to safely mitigate these types of larger fires. <br /> <br />If we were to use our sample structure, change it to Type Il-B (fire resistive) construction, and apply <br />the NrPA standards for fire flow reductions at sprinkle red properties, we can take up to a 75% <br />reduction in fire flows. Using the sample formula listed above. the basic fire flow will be 2,250 gpl1l. <br />Assuming the sample structure meets all the requisite building requirements, our new fire flow could <br />then be 562.5 gpm. By dividing 562.5 gpm by 250 gpm nozzle flow, you obtain 2.25 hose lines x 3 <br />firefighters = approximately 7 firefighters, plus a 1/3 increase for other johs (e.g.. ventilation.laddering, <br />and rescue), which equals approximately 10 firefighters. <br /> <br />The use of automatic fire sprinkler protection to control fire relates to more than just personnel and <br />equipment. The ability to control fire often extends heyond the ability of fire suppression systems <br />because the time of discovery and the rapidity of flame spread is often uncontrolled. Considering these <br />possibilities, analysis indicates that any size structure could be subject to heavy or total fire loss <br />regardless offire department size. This should be given equal or greater consideration than personnel <br />demand. <br /> <br />This initiative is only a part of our overall analysis and recommendation for improvement to our <br />community fire defense programs. Some other factors include: fire station locations, sUlffing and skills <br />mix, volunteer resource availability, apparatus types and capabilities - in addition to other structural <br />modifications such as compartmentation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.