My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 09 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 09 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:20 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 3:44:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/21/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 09 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />9/21/82 <br /> <br />Page -2- <br /> <br />Administrator Wurl to contact interested <br />people for Council's consideration at their <br />next meeting. <br /> <br />AUDIENCE COMMENTS <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />ORDINANCE #772 - BOULDER <br />COUNTY ANNEXATION - PUBLIC <br />HEARING <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Attorney Rautenstraus read the ordinance <br />by title only on second reading - public <br />hearing and certified proper publication. <br /> <br />Mayor Meier opened the public hearing and <br />Attorney Rautenstraus advised notice of <br />public hearings published in the Louisville <br />Times September 1, and September 8, 1982. <br />Director of Community Development Rupp <br />showed a slide presentation of the area <br />depicting location. He advised the zoning <br />as recommEmded by the staff is to be divided <br />into agric:ultural and office - with the <br />front 2 ac:res facing South Boulder Road <br />be zoned office, and the remaining 4 acres <br />to the north in agricultural zoning. Each <br />councilmember had a copy of the annexation <br />agreement. There is a provision in the <br />annexation agreement which indicates that the <br />annexation fees would be waived upon the <br />development of the site, if the site is <br />held under the ownership of the County and <br />the use of the ground was for County purposes. <br />Upon sale of the property by the County, all <br />fees and conditions of annexation would have <br />to be met with the City. The County had been <br />provided vvith a copy of the annexation agree- <br />ment but had not been signed as of this even- <br />ing. <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Inquired if anyone had submitted a proposal <br />for the development of the property for <br />a branch office for the County. <br />Rupp advised that the owner of the adjacent <br />property had contacted him indicating an <br />interest in the property; and the adjacent <br />owner stated they would like to work out <br />something with the County as far as the <br />Christopher Village project is concerned <br />because they could possibly offer them an <br />immediate type building in exchange for a <br />land type arrangement. However, there is <br />nothing firm on this to date. This was <br />the only proposal that Rupp was familiar with. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.