Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Councilwoman Morris <br /> <br />Councilman Cussen <br /> <br />Councilman Cummings <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />ORDINANCE #769 - SUBDIVISION <br />AND ZONING CODE CHANGES <br /> <br />Councilman Ferrera <br /> <br />9/7/82 <br /> <br />Page -3- <br /> <br />Inquired of Engineer Blanchard if he would <br />be able to take into a count that the children <br />are crossing at all the different locations. <br />Blanchard assured him that he would - a <br />total count would be done by intersections. <br />Councilman Leary expressed further concerns <br />about the warrant count - if the count was <br />split evenly and the children were to cross <br />at the same place can this be justified. <br />Blanchard said they could. <br /> <br />Inquired of Mrs. Laurence if there was one <br />particular intersection that would be best <br />as far as a protective intersection. <br />Mrs. Laurence stated that the most central <br />place is the intersection of Lincoln and <br />Pine Streets. <br /> <br />Suggested that a department of the City draw <br />up a safe-walking route - have it presented <br />to the Elementary School Principal - felt <br />it would be very helpful and would be bene- <br />ficial in the future. He further suggested <br />a map be given to both the Elementary and <br />Middle Schools showing the route. <br /> <br />Also expressed his concern and assured Mrs. <br />Laurence that if the count did not warrant <br />signing, other alternatives would be pursued. <br /> <br />Attorney Rautenstraus read the ordinance by <br />title only and certified proper publication. <br />Councilmembers had been provided copies of <br />the proposed amendment. The amendment dealt <br />specifically with the 500' notification of <br />property owners of a subdivision. <br /> <br />Inquired how much more postage expense would <br />be incurred with the 500' notification notices; <br />also should the fees be increased to the <br />developer? <br />Director Rupp suggested this fee be assessed <br />at the time the application was submitted, <br />when they had supplied staff with the mailing <br />lists and proper postage for the notifications. <br />The applicant is required to obtain this in- <br />formation from the County, then if there is <br />a question if someone is not notified, the <br />City will not be at fault because it is the <br />applicant who will be challenged if the City <br />had not been given a proper mailing list. <br />