My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 07 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 07 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 4:00:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
7/20/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 07 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilman Cussen <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />AUDIENCE COMMENTS <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />ORDINANCE #768 - TAX REBATE <br /> <br />TION TO PUBLISH <br />-...."--. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Morris <br /> <br />AMENDMENT TO HAVE LIMIT <br />AT $12,000.00 FOR REBATE <br /> <br />Councilman Fauson <br /> <br />7/20/82 <br /> <br />Page -4- <br /> <br />elected officials - any person who has con- <br />tributed to the City, and possibly people <br />from outside the City if they have done some- <br />thing for the City; submit their list to <br />City Council and continue to add to the list <br />as they see fit. <br /> <br />Expressed his desire to make the idea more <br />inclusive more than just the naming of streets, <br />and suggested that future buildings, i.e. <br />libraries, and future schools in the area be added. <br /> <br />Wished this included in his motion. <br />Question called for on the motion. All in <br />favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Each councilmember had a copy of the ordinance <br />before them. Attorney Rautenstraus read the <br />ordinance by title only and the request was <br />for Council's authorization for publication. <br /> <br />Councilman Fauson moved, Councilman Ferrera <br />seconded Ordinance #768 - Tax Rebate be <br />published. <br /> <br />Commented that she would like to suggest <br />a maximum limit pertinent to household <br />income of $8,801.00 and up - judging by <br />those people 'who still have a significant <br />income may not need this tax rebate. <br />Attorney Rautenstraus advised as the ordinance <br />now reads everyone 65 and older receives some <br />benefit, but if Council wished this portion <br />changed he would be happy to make the change. <br />It was his suggestion that an $11,000.00 <br />maximum be placed in this category. <br /> <br />Councilman Cussen moved, Councilwoman seconded <br />that a maximum household income of $12,000.00 <br />be allowed for a tax rebate on the water and <br />sewer rate increase. <br /> <br />Wished to verify if Black Lung payments were <br />considered income or medical payments? <br />It was his desire to have this considered <br />as a medical payment rather than income. <br />Attorney Rautenstraus advised Black Lung <br />payments could be considered medical payments. <br />The City Administrator will make up the appli- <br />cation form and would be cognate as the govern- <br />ing agency in this respect. Since these types <br />payments are non-taxable they would not be <br />considered income. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.