My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 04 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 04 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/9/2009 2:57:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/20/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 04 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Councilman Ferrera <br /> <br />Administrator Wur1 <br /> <br />)unci1man Ferrera <br /> <br />Administrator Wur1 <br /> <br />Motion to Table the Trousi1 <br />Request <br /> <br />STEWART REQUEST - ANNEXATION <br /> <br />4/20/82 <br /> <br />Page -10- <br /> <br />with the date the light industrial zoning <br />was designated by the County, and a copy <br />of the rE~ferra1 comments made to the <br />County regarding the Trousi1 property. <br /> <br />Concurred that a letter should be written <br />to the County, but it was his opinion the <br />overall intent of the letter should be to <br />see if there is any possible way of resolving <br />this issue, and if there should be others <br />that may create the same problem in the <br />future; not just to reprimand them. <br /> <br />Wanted to confirm - if council denied the <br />request, would Trousil still be allowed to <br />build? <br /> <br />Advised it was his opinion that if Mr. <br />Trousi1 was abiding by all the laws of the <br />County; he has a well permit; permission <br />for a ceptic tank, the building permit is <br />all he needs. <br /> <br />Inquired would it be advantagious to the <br />City that if Mr. Trousi1 does build,to grant <br />the utility request, would we have some <br />control over the subdivision. He felt <br />the area had always been an open space <br />priority of the City as it is a main entrance. <br />He also felt as the designation stands, the <br />applicant could do whatever he wished to do. <br /> <br />Commented in his opinion, in the best interests <br />of the City, as difficult as it is to do, <br />subject the granting of utilities to his <br />annexation of the property to the City. <br />Then he would be subject to the City's re- <br />quirements. <br /> <br />Councilman Ferrera moved, Councilman Cummings <br />moved to table the Trousi1 request until <br />next City Council meeting of May 4, 1982. <br />Question called for. All in favor. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Each counci1member had a copy of the request. <br />The applicant was not present. <br />In answer to Councilman Leary's request, <br />Director Rupp advised present zoning was <br />Agricultural - Residential. Commercial <br />zoning requests would have to be considered <br />by Council individually. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.