My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2022 04 22
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2022 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2022 04 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2022 5:35:22 PM
Creation date
5/2/2022 10:26:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/22/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Economic Vitality Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 25, 2022 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />intended to capture foundational information and that issue/trend questions <br />would change over time. <br />Councilmember Fahey questioned if there is an area to capture COVID and <br />Marshall Fire impacts to the business. Councilmember Dickinson responded <br />that there have been previous surveys intended for COVID and Marshall Fire <br />impacts and wondered if these topics should be included on this particular <br />survey. Director Pierce clarified that this survey is intended to capture <br />information that is not available through other sources, such as company plans <br />for remote workforce. <br />Councilmember Most asked whether it would be worth incentivizing responses <br />in certain areas to provide a complete picture of the business community. <br />Director Pierce confirmed that staff is aware that certain businesses that <br />subscribe to the newsletter or are members of the Louisville Chamber or <br />Downtown Business Association, may be receiving and responding to this <br />information disproportionately to other businesses. <br />Councilmember Dickinson agreed that each response would not necessarily <br />reflect an equal portion of the business community and that it's important to <br />determine what the information that is being gathered will be used for. He asked <br />whether the correct questions are being asked in order to inform Council and <br />inform policy changes. <br />Councilmember Fahey commented that engaging on a personal level with local <br />staff will generally lead to increased response rates. <br />Public comment from Rick Kron: Mr. Kron commented that the survey is a great <br />idea but that larger national retailers do not respond to these surveys. He <br />agreed that making a connection with the local store manager is important for <br />ensuring responses. Mr. Kron continued that the survey needs to identify <br />advantages that might be present in competing locations but not in Louisville. <br />He also commented on the importance of protection of confidential commercial <br />information. Mr. Kron closed his comments by suggesting that the City include <br />information on what it has accomplished in response to previous surveys such <br />as the quiet rail corridor. <br />Councilmember Most agreed that it may be beneficial to showcase City action <br />that has been taken in response to previous surveys. She also agreed that the <br />survey may not be the best tool for a big box employer and that a one-on-one <br />interviews may be more beneficial. <br />Councilmember Dickinson questioned the wording and meaning of some of the <br />COVID questions. Director Pierce confirmed that she will revise the language. <br />Councilmember Most wondered whether there was an option to differentiate or <br />tailor questions between businesses that were shut down during COVID versus <br />Agenda Packet P. 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.