Laserfiche WebLink
May 11, 2022 Minutes Continued- Mr. Bell Citizen Comment Materials <br />Safety <br />Park managers and community officials ranked the safety of people and dogs as a primary concern in <br />dealing with dog parks. However, our study, as well as those conducted elsewhere, reveal that injuries <br />to people and dogs from dog bites at legal off-Ieash areas are rare. One possible reason for the low risk <br />of a dog bite may be that park users almost always do not bring dogs that are likely to bite other dogs <br />or people. However, overly assertive, overly unruly, and undersocialized dogs can negatively impact <br />the behavior and welfare of other dogs visiting the park. To help ensure that this does not become an <br />issue, the following suggestions should be implemented: <br />Overtly aggressive, overly assertive, overly unruly, and undersocialized dogs should be <br />discouraged from visiting the parks. Park users should be educated in the signs that dogs <br />display when performing these behaviors. While not aggressive to the point of fighting with <br />other dogs, a dog that displays these types of behaviors can cause other dogs to become <br />excessively fearful. <br />2. Park users should be discouraged from bringing young puppies or fearful dogs to parks, as they <br />may be made more fearful by highly assertive dogs, highly interactive dogs, or rough play. A <br />fearful dog may snap or bite as a way of defending itself, and perhaps develop problems that <br />can be seen outside of the confines of a dog park. <br />3. The park users must have their dog under voice control. <br />4. Children should always be closely supervised by a responsible adult. <br />S. Owners should carry their leash on them at all times. <br />6. One activity for a dog park club is to help monitor interactions between dogs and other dogs <br />and between dogs and people. The best option for an organization is to obtain indemnification <br />from potential liability from their local government. If local government has this sort of <br />expectation from a dog park user group, then the governmental entity should be required to <br />indemnify the group and absorb any legal liability (and legal costs) that might ensue. <br />Noise <br />This is another frequently mentioned concern of community officials. The noise level at parks <br />invariably increased over baseline in the area of the highest concentration of activity during peak use. <br />The degree that the surrounding community will notice this depends upon the degree to which the <br />noise level potentially reflects an increase in ambient noise from such things as noise from increased <br />automobile traffic. It should be kept in mind that sound level declines exponentially with distance from <br />the source of the sound. Our research revealed no correlation approaching significance between the <br />increase in noise level at dog parks during times of heavy use and ranking of park success. In park <br />locations where noise from dogs may be an issue, we suggest the following: <br />1. Do not establish a dog park immediately adjacent to residential property lines. <br />2. If the dog park must be located immediately adjacent to residential property lines, create sound -- <br />buffers with plant_%, fencing or earthen berms if needed. <br />3. If an established park shares a border with residential property lines, move the area of heaviest — <br />usage away from that boundary. <br />