Laserfiche WebLink
public land dedication proposal. The current proposal includes 89.9 acres of land for public <br />dedication. The prior PUD had 39 acres within the property and 20 acres separate for <br />conservation easement; it also included 222 acres of private common open space. The Redtail <br />Ridge GDP amendment proposal had 93 acres of public land. Rob displayed the plat document <br />with public land dedication summary, including trail corridors. He displayed the trail plan <br />overview. Rob explained that the property outside of City of Louisville in Broomfield would have <br />a conservation easement protection on it. <br />Additional detail was described, including: <br />• Two drainage areas that would also be underpasses for trails under Campus Drives <br />• The developer would build all trails as part of dedication <br />• Trail through open space runs along existing drainage way <br />• There is a Metro district planned for landscaping <br />• City would take care of hardscape within public right of way <br />In his presentation Rob shared Louisville Municipal Code sections that staff felt were most <br />relevant to OSAB. He stated staff was asking for a recommendation, which could include a <br />recommendation of approval, conditional recommendation of approval, or a recommendation <br />of denial. Alternatively, OSAB could also ask for additional information on any relevant topic <br />related to their review. <br />Board Questions <br />David asked about the 80 exempt acres (related to the 12% land dedication requirement). Staff <br />explained that these related to Storage Teck's private recreation facilities; even though the <br />facilities don't exist anymore the exemptions don't go away. <br />Charles asked staff to clarify the difference between new plan and what went up for a public <br />vote in April. Staff explained that a GDP is fundamentally different from a subdivision plat, which <br />outlines legal law boundaries, rights of way, etc. A subdivision plat needs to comply with 2010 <br />GDP and it does. The difference is in square footage of development (2.5M sq ft vs. 3M). <br />Allowed uses (commercial and office, some light industrial) are very similar. The 2010 plan <br />envisioned private roads, which the developer is now proposing be public. City Council's <br />approval of amended GDP was 83 acres. Current proposal has open space in generally the same <br />location. What is new is open space areas in the West and East <br />Helen asked if there is a maximum dedication. Helen also asked about % land dedications in <br />other developments. Staff offered to share numbers, which range from 12% into 30%'s. Coal <br />Creek was highest with a dedicated golf course. Several other GDP's have been approved with <br />less dedication than this plan. <br />Applicant Presentation <br />Jay Hardy from Brue Baukol reviewed the presentation included in the May 2022 OSAB meeting <br />packet. Some points covered include: <br />o They started by outlining natural areas existing already <br />