Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 09, 2022 <br />Page 2 of 14 <br />Applicant: City of Louisville <br />Case Planner: Lisa Ritchie, Fire Recovery and Planning Manager <br />All notice was met as required and there is no commissioner conflict of interest. <br />Staff Presentation: <br />Ritchie begins by discussing the background on this ordinance. She then reviews the <br />House Bill 21-1117, the Colorado General Assembly. It clarifies that cities have the <br />authority to regulate development or redevelopment in order to promote the construction <br />of new affordable housing units. If affordable housing is required, certain actions must <br />be taken to increase the overall number and density of housing units within the City or <br />create incentives. <br />On August 25, 2021, staff had a discussion and talked about direction with City Council. <br />Staff brought a discussion for incentive options that could increase the amount of <br />affordable housing within the City. City Council directed development of a housing study <br />and discussion through the Comprehensive Plan process on possible incentives and <br />areas within the City that could support additional affordable housing. The City received <br />a DOLA grant of $60,000 for a housing study, but the housing study and comp plan was <br />postponed due to Marshall Fire. <br />She then reviews what the draft ordinance would entail. It includes the following: <br />• It would be included on the 2022 City Council work plan. <br />• It requires 30% inclusionary housing when a property is rezoned from a non- <br />residential zone district to one that allows residential uses. <br />• As drafted, it would not apply to residential units developed in a zone district that <br />allows housing through an SRU. <br />• It increases the fee -in -lieu to $23.11 per sq ft for for -sale units and $10.67 for <br />for -rent units (12% fee -in -lieu is $9.24 and $4.72 per sq ft). <br />She mentions that approvals of this ordinance does not change the existing <br />Comprehensive Plan and Small Area Plan policies for rezoning of a property to allow <br />residential development. She also states that this ordinance should be evaluated for <br />compliance with state law. <br />She concludes her presentation by noting that there is a lack of policy alignment for <br />rezoning of property to allow residential development, and there are financial feasibility <br />barriers to the effectiveness of this ordinance. City Council has included the <br />consideration of an ordinance on the 2022 Work Plan. Planning Commission's <br />recommendation is required prior to the City Council consideration. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff. - <br />Moline asks where the 30% comes from. <br />Ritchie says City Council established that percentage but staff is unsure of the <br />reasoning behind that number. <br />Moline asks if staff can go into more depth on the state law and the increase in density. <br />Ritchie says that the first part is that cities have the authority to adopt and enforce <br />these kinds of ordinances. If the city is going to require affordable housing though, the <br />