Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: 2008 AUDIT MANAGEMENT LETTER <br />DATE: J U LY 20, 2009 <br />approved vendor list with the costs of maintaining and reconciling to such a list, <br />especially in a decentralized purchasing environment. Along with an approved vendor <br />listing, management will consider other ways to reduce confusion and to help prevent <br />unauthorized purchases. <br />Auditors' Comment: <br />All large vendors should also be checked against the EPLS website for any suspension <br />and debarment concerns. <br />Management's Response: <br />Management will inform departments to check all large vendors on the EPLS Website <br />for suspension or debarment concerns. <br />Auditors' Comment: <br />We recommend that all receiving reports related to purchases conducted in other <br />departments be forwarded to the Finance department for record keeping purposes. <br />Management's Response: <br />Management will inform all departments to include receiving reports when submitting <br />payment requests to the Finance Department. The Finance Department will retain the <br />receiving reports with the other accounts payable information. <br />Auditors' Comment: <br />To adequately improve the segregation of duties within the City's accounting functions, <br />we recommend that an individual without access to the accounts payable module for <br />entering the payables and paying the vendor be made responsible for setting up vendors <br />in the accounting system. <br />Management's Response: <br />Management will work to segregate these functions. However, this is a relatively difficult <br />segregation for such a small department and management will need to weigh the <br />benefits versus the costs and inefficiencies. <br />