Laserfiche WebLink
windows are not original. However, the exterior materials have changed from stucco (visible in <br />the 1948 Assessor's Card photo) to siding, a change that likely first occurred in 1975 (47 years <br />ago) according to the Building Permit file for the property. No other exterior changes other than <br />reroofing were noted in the Permit file in the past 50 years. <br />CRITERIA FOR DEMOLITION REVIEW: <br />The Historic Preservation Commission should review the demolition permit application based <br />upon any of the following criteria in Section 15.36.200(H) of the Louisville Municipal Code <br />LMC : <br />Criteria <br />Meets <br />Evaluation <br />Criteria? <br />1. The eligibility of the building for <br />Yes <br />Aqe <br />designation as an individual <br />The principal structure was <br />landmark consistent with the <br />constructed circa 1909 making it <br />purposes and standards in this <br />around 113 years old. <br />chapter, <br />a. Age <br />Significance <br />b. Significance <br />This house is associated with one of <br />c. Physical Integrity <br />Louisville's most notable Italian <br />families, the Colaccis, and has ties to <br />several aspects of Louisville's social <br />and economic heritage, including coal <br />mining, bootlegging, the restaurant <br />industry, and small-scale poultry <br />raising. <br />Integrity <br />The structure remains it its original <br />location and setting, and appears to <br />maintain the footprint and exterior <br />characteristics of the original structure. <br />2. The relationship of the building as a <br />No <br />The house is not located in a historic <br />potential contributing structure to a <br />district. <br />potential historical district per the <br />criteria set forth in this chapter; <br />3. The reasonable condition of the <br />Unknown <br />The applicant did not provide any <br />building*, and <br />documentation regarding the condition <br />of the property. <br />4. The reasonable projected cost of <br />Unknown <br />A specific projected cost was not <br />restoration or repair,* <br />included as part of the application. <br />* In considering the condition of the building and the projected cost of restoration or repair as set <br />forth in subsections H.3 and H.4, above, the commission may not consider deterioration caused <br />by unreasonable neglect. <br />4 <br />Demolition Review, 1209 Main Street <br />