My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1979 01 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1979 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1979 01 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:14 PM
Creation date
8/10/2009 11:30:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/16/1979
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1979 01 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />January 16, 1979 <br />Minutes - page 5 <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. 623 <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />CONTINUED <br /> <br />In order to test zoning regulations as <br />applied to this particular property, we <br />have to look at the uses that are permitted <br />under the A-Agricultural zoning district. <br />Permitted uses by right, under you code, <br />#l-Agricultural or commercial crop or <br />animal production. <br />#2-Single family dwellings on 5 acre lots. <br />ift3-Cemeteries. <br />#4-Mortuaries and funeral chapels, and that's <br />it. <br />Those are the uses that this 47 acre tract <br />of land may be utilized for; and that's <br />what the property owners can look to. <br />Agricultural or commercial crop production, <br />single family dwellings on 5 acre lots, <br />cemeteries and mortuaries and funeral chapels. <br />I think you have to agree with me that that <br />is the most restrictive zone in the City of <br />Louisville, and that it is a very restrictive <br />use category especially when you consider, <br />we are not talking about a county or a non <br />incorporated area, we are talking about an <br />urban area, we are talking about the City <br />of Louisville. We are talking about land <br />inside the City of Louisville. We believe <br />that it is far too restrictive insofar as <br />those enumerated uses and it is not rea- <br />sonable and therefore must be changed. <br />Consistent with this is the Colorado Mun- <br />icipal Annexation Act. As you know, you <br />annex property in accordance with the state <br />statutes which provide for annexation to <br />municipalities. In order for an area to <br />be eligible for annexation to the City of <br />Louisville, there must be a showing and a <br />finding by you that the area to be annexed <br />"is urban or will be urbanized in the near <br />future", now that's a site right out of the <br />annexation act. The statute also defines <br />what urban development means and it's de- <br />fined as follows: the construction on land <br />of improvements for residential, institutional <br />commercial, industrial, transportation, pub- <br />lic flood control and recreational and <br />similar uses in contrast to use of the land <br />for growing crops, truck gardening, grazing <br />of farm animals or other agricultural pur- <br />suits. The statute I am reading from is <br />C.R.S. 31-12-103(13). Now what that basic- <br />ally is saying is you have to contrast <br />urbanization as opposed to agricultural uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.