My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 10 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2022 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 10 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2022 4:59:37 PM
Creation date
10/27/2022 1:24:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/17/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 19, 2022 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />histories, our museum staff cannot create one within 21 days. If it is possible to uncover <br />any historical information or social significance, it will be bumped up to the 60-day <br />review. Staff in many cases, cannot get the full extensive history within a 21 day time <br />period. <br />Dunlap asks if the museum reviewed this. <br />Brackett Hogstad says that the museum did review this and it took four weeks to <br />review and provide the historical information. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Pete Abel, 821 Mount Evans Ct <br />Abel says this structure is planned to be re -purposed into multi -family. He wishes not to <br />have this stay exist on the property. <br />Commissioner Questions of Applicant: <br />Dunlap asks if the duplexes involve subdividing the land into two lots. <br />Abel says no that is incorrect. <br />Dunlap says so it will be four rentable units with one ownership. <br />Abel says that is correct. <br />Burg asks if they have thought about alternate uses that will preserve some of the <br />structure but still accomplish his goals. <br />Abel says based off the purchase price of the property, they really need to get four units <br />out of it. <br />Public Comment: <br />Steve Selden, 1225 Main St <br />Selden says he is concerned about the historical background and removing that from <br />Louisville's history. He loves the architecture and the feel of Louisville's small New <br />England village. He is also concerned with this property turning into a duplex. <br />Brad Natzke, 730 Lafayette St <br />Natzke says he advocates against demolition. He enjoys that there are so many historic <br />homes in downtown Louisville. <br />HPC adds a letter of opposition into the record for public comment. <br />Discussion by Commissioners: <br />Haley says this meets the 50-year or older criteria. It has strong architectural integrity <br />and social history significance. Main Street is one of the most prominent streets. This <br />also has a larger lot and smaller house, which is a historic ratio of house to land. <br />Burg says there are many of these bungalows in Louisville. They are scattered <br />throughout multiple neighborhoods. She asks if a new build would be required to meet <br />historic material requirements such as siding. <br />Brackett Hogstad says in Old Town, we do not have anything that regulates the <br />architecture for residences. <br />Zuccaro says there are requirements for roof pitches and a lot coverage and floor area <br />maximum. The downtown commercial properties have to adhere to the downtown <br />design standards. <br />Haley asks if this is zoned to allow duplexes. <br />Brackett Hogstad says that is correct. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.