My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 12 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2022 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 12 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 5:31:15 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 3:22:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
12/8/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 2. Based on the testimony of the witnesses and the documents and <br />other evidence made a part of the record of the hearing before the Planning <br />Commission, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed subdivision does not <br />promote the following purposes set forth in Section 16.04.020 of the Louisville Municipal <br />Code ("LMC"), or comply with the following standards set forth in LMC Chapter 16.16 <br />and this title: <br />A. The Planning Commission finds that the application from Sterling Bay (the <br />"Applicant") for approval of the Redtail Ridge Filing No. 1 Preliminary and <br />Final Subdivision Plat (the "Application") does not comply with LMC Sec. <br />16.16.010.D. and E., which states that natural features and vegetation must <br />be preserved to the extent possible and a need for additional open space <br />may be based on vegetation and the type and density of the propose <br />development. The Applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed <br />subdivision adequately preserves natural features, wildlife habitat and <br />vegetation of the property. Previously undeveloped areas on the northern <br />portion of the property include natural vegetation that could be further <br />preserved as public or private open space with clustering of the <br />development lots to the south. <br />B. The Planning Commission finds that the Application does not comply with <br />LMC Sec. 16.04.020.K, which states the purpose of a subdivision is to avoid <br />traffic congestion, based on the following: <br />According to the traffic study submitted with the Application, the US 36 <br />and Northwest Parkway interchange reaches a Level of Service F and <br />would need modified by the year 2027-2028 to provide additional <br />vehicular capacity to accommodate the proposed subdivision. The <br />Application does not include proposals for mitigation, road capacity <br />work, or contribution to future road capacity work for the interchange, <br />nor are future improvements planned at this time. <br />2. The Application does not include a commitment from Northwest <br />Parkway Authority for the acquisition of right of way needed to <br />construct road capacity improvements included in the traffic study as <br />needed to mitigate traffic congestion. <br />C. The Planning Commission finds that the Application does not comply with <br />LMC Sec. 16.16.040 concerning block length, as some blocks proposed in <br />the Application exceed the maximum length of 1,320 feet. Although the <br />Applicant requested a modification pursuant to LMC Chapter 16.24 to allow <br />longer block lengths, the Commission does not find that there are unique <br />physical or topographical circumstances or conditions to justify the <br />modification. Maintaining prescribed block lengths is necessary to ensure an <br />adequate and convenient transportation system to serve the proposed <br />subdivision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.