My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2022 03 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2022 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2022 03 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2023 1:26:08 PM
Creation date
1/30/2023 1:14:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
3/10/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 10, 2022 <br />Page 2 of 10 <br />C. LMC Amendment — Banquet or Reception Halls and 957 Main Street Banquet <br />Hall SRU: A request for approval of an ordinance to amend Title 17 to create a use <br />group for Banquet or Reception Halls (Resolution No. 4, Series 2022) and a request for <br />approval of a Special Review Use Amendment No. 3, 824 South Street / 957 Main <br />Street (Resolution No. 5, Series 2022). <br />• Applicant: Hartronft Associates <br />• Case Planner: Kim Bauer, Historic Preservation Planner <br />All notice was met as required and there is no commissioner conflict of interest. <br />Staff Presentation: <br />Bauer begins by giving the commissioners an aerial overview of the property and <br />discusses the background of the property. She gives the definition of what a banquet or <br />reception hall is, and mentions that the Special Review Use (SRU) with Public Hearing <br />is not permitted for Residential and Agricultural or Residential mixed use (Mu-R). <br />She moves on to the SRU proposal that allows a banquet hall use on the property and <br />no change to the exterior. This would be the likely development of the property: <br />• The first floor would be available to rent for private events. This could <br />accommodate seating for potential ceremonies. <br />• The second floor would be available to rent for private events. This could <br />accommodate seating or tables for a potential reception area. <br />690 square feet of the basement space will be finished and used as both the <br />preparation area for the reception hall and as an indoor drinking establishment. <br />This is not a part of the SRU but would be its own Administrative Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD). <br />Staff has analyzed the current application in context of the previous SRU submittal for <br />this property, which was a hotel use. At that time, staff evaluated the development to <br />compare parking demand with the likely build -out scenario vs. a build -out with a <br />restaurant on the first floor and office on the second floor. An office use generates the <br />need for roughly 10 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 sq ft). A hotel use generates the <br />need for roughly 9-10 spaces (one space per room, plus one space per two <br />employees). Staff also evaluated the reconfiguration of parking in the South Street right- <br />of-way, which could result in up to five more spaces, along with options for parking <br />management. <br />She then reviews the five approval criteria necessary for an SRU and the following <br />modifications and/or conditions for the SRU: <br />1. Size and location of the site <br />2. Internal traffic circulation and access to adjoining public streets <br />3. Location and amount of off-street parking <br />4. Fencing, screening, and landscaping separations, including open space <br />5. Building bulk and location <br />6. Signs and lighting <br />7. Noise, vibration, air pollution, and other environmental influences <br />Staff finds the proposal meets all five criteria when considering approval of a SRU: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.