My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 02 01
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDSCAPING ADVISORY BOARD (fka HORTICULTURE FORESTRY ADVISORY BOARD)
>
2023 Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 02 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2023 3:37:44 PM
Creation date
1/30/2023 4:18:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/1/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Parks & Public Landscaping Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />January 4, 2023 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />• Develop a documented preventative maintenance plan <br />• Adopt software to manage maintenance workflow <br />• Implement a staffing plan consistent with benchmarking plan <br />• Develop a system to document and tract staff task time <br />• Complete the inventory of assets, refinement of accuracy of data <br />• Conduct parks and recreation specific resilience planning, that includes <br />security, emergency preparedness and continuity of operations <br />• Implement a performance management system using key performance <br />indicators (KPI's) <br />D. Plan for Improvement — CAPRA standards (Commission for <br />Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies) <br />Discussion: <br />• Cynthia offered kudos to the presentation, especially in how <br />Louisville compares as a park city (Louisville has many more parks <br />per resident than comparable cities) <br />• Ellen agreed with a very thorough review. Question regarding <br />inventory: Studio CPG counted more than 28 parks including Mesa <br />ponds, 2 Cedar -edge locations and Waneka Lake. There are trails <br />running through these areas, which may be why they were counted <br />as parks when PPLAB had not considered them as such. <br />• Ellen noted that the staff commented that they respond to `squeaky <br />wheel" requests — how would the City transition to more of a <br />scheduled maintenance plan? Abby: Developing a work order <br />process and response time with priority has been used in Abby's <br />past experience and could be used again here in Louisville. Work <br />order data will also help with keeping the story of work order type, <br />response, etc. <br />• Laurie asked if data collection would require additional personnel — <br />Abby feels that a hybrid process may be used with staff input, role <br />definitions TBD. <br />• Patricia asked about the overall timeline of implementation. Studio <br />CPG responded that funding has been put into next year's budget <br />to begin building the program. Overall a 2-3 year process. (Year 1 <br />planning, Year 2 implementation) <br />• PPLAB discussed giving staff additional positive feedback <br />• This presentation will be given to City Council on January 24th <br />2023 Work Plan Review <br />• Park Sign prioritization: Begin prioritizing 3-5 signs for replacement. <br />Email park names to Abby, include pictures if available, etc. prior to <br />February meeting. <br />• Discussion around re -visiting small parks that do not currently have <br />signs. <br />• Discussion around Green, Blue, Yellow levels of service to prioritize <br />or plan scheduled maintenance for parks (for example a small park <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.