Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular Meeting, Louisville City Council, June 6, 1978 <br /> <br />ITEMS FROM PEOPLE IN <br />ATTENDANCE NOT APPEARING <br />ON THE AGENDA: <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: <br />RESOLUTION NO. l7-ADOPTING <br />PERSONNEL CODE <br /> <br />RESOLUTION No. 18 <br />CITY DOCUMENTS <br /> <br />RESOLUTION No. 19 <br />INITIATING ANNEXATION <br />PROCEDURES FOR PROPERTY <br />OWNED BY DANAILOFF, KING, <br />FOSTER, ERBERS & SANTILLI <br /> <br />PAGE 6 <br /> <br />There was no one present that wished to <br />speak. <br /> <br />Attorney Joss read the resolution. Council- <br />man Gene DiCarlo moved that Resolution No. 17, <br />Series 1978 be adopted. Seconded by Council- <br />man Mary DiLorenzo. Question called for. <br />4 ayes. Opposed none. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Attorney Joss read the resolution in its <br />entirety. Councilman Meier moved that <br />Resolution #18, Series 1978 be adopted. <br />Seconded by Councilman DiCarlo. Question <br />called for. 4 ayes - opposed none. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Attorney Joss explained to Council the pro- <br />ceeding for this anticipated annexation <br />was unique since 100% of the property owners <br />were not involved. There was a small tract <br />of land, less than one acre, that divides <br />the EBERS property from the FOSTER property. <br />He had researched the records at Boulder <br />County and to this time was unable to find <br />who owned this small tract, even the Title <br />Company's were uncertain. State Statutes <br />allow the City to annex the total parcel of <br />property, but the procedure is different <br />from other annexations. The resolution pro- <br />poses our intention to annex this property <br />and a public hearing be set, publication <br />notices are different. At the Public Hearing, <br />Council has to review whether or not the <br />property is eligible for annexation. This <br />resolution only indicates that the City <br />formally accepted the petition to annex the <br />particular parcel in question and set forth <br />publicly that Council is willing to proceed <br />with the necessary hearings and statuatory <br />procedures to consider the annexation. <br /> <br />Attorney Joss read Resolution #19, Series 1978 <br />in its entirety. Councilman DiCarlo moved <br />that Resolution No. 19, Series 1978 be adopted <br />and a Public Hearing be set for July 6, 1978. <br />Seconded by Councilman Meier. Question called <br />for. 4 ayes - none opposed. Motion carried. <br />