Laserfiche WebLink
Cultural Council <br />Agenda <br />DATE <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />Grace states that the process of a national call and public comment is our <br />approval from the community when no objections are made. If City Council has <br />the last word, and they pull projects at the end for things like location which was <br />decided long ago, then they will need to approve every step of the way, each <br />detail and line item about the call approved before it goes out. Otherwise, who <br />will want to work on any public art project? I would not go through this process <br />again to get to the end for them to pull it over something they could have <br />weighed in on early in the process. <br />Pat asks if City Council understands the process of acquiring public art? Mark <br />insists multiple times that if the exact location was written in the Call for Entry, all <br />confusion would be avoided. Beth points out that argument is that they want it at <br />the Arboretum. Sharon confirms the Arboretum is not in the historic downtown <br />corridor so even if the exact location was written in the Call, we would have the <br />same issue. Sharon confirms the locations that were noticed were written in the <br />Call appropriately. <br />Grace's comment is that this sculpture is called Community Resilience. It is not <br />Thee Memorial to commemorate the fires. It was meant to bring healing and <br />beauty and to talk about our resilience as a town. As such, it's for everybody, not <br />just for the people who lost their homes. So then by City Council's thinking, all <br />21,000 people in Louisville should be consulted on design and placement. What <br />is City Council's suggestion on how to achieve this? Sarah believes this is an <br />important point that should be clarified to City Council. <br />Mark questions whether the process is flawed and needs modifying or is this an <br />exception that is difficult in the process we have. JR believes it's a one off but <br />this sets a dangerous precedent. Beth feels this was dismissive to the artists who <br />participated. She wants a disclaimer in the Call for Entry saying City Council has <br />the last word, so good luck. JR thinks this is going to hurt the reputation of arts in <br />Louisville. Grace thinks it already has. JR states that City Council should be <br />informed that we are open to liability if we just move this winning sculpture to a <br />location that was not noticed. <br />Mark questions the location again and Sharon confirms all notices that were <br />posted were in the Historic Downtown zone and Erica reiterates that the location <br />is a collaboration between the winning artist, LCC and the City. Memory Square <br />and City Hall both fall into the zone that was in the call. <br />- Discussion item: What should be included in artists' proposals? Tabled <br />to the February agenda. <br />14. Cultural Council Art Grants (JR) <br />- Art grant applications were distributed to all LCC members; JR will email a <br />scoring sheet to all members after this meeting. LCC members to score all <br />