Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 09, 2023 <br />Page 11 of 15 <br />Moline says he is not opposed to this proposal. We have not seen evidence that <br />we will change the city's carbon footprint by adopting this. He mentions City <br />Council's sustainability work plan and says there are bigger goals the City needs <br />to work towards. Those other goals could make a greater impact on the City's <br />climate and sustainability goals than this effort. He would appreciate seeing data <br />that shows that by limiting gas stations in a town, it would have a positive <br />environmental impact. <br />Howe says he thinks this ordinance moves the needle in the right direction. He is <br />not opposed to it. He discusses how the topic of energy is complicated. He would <br />like to think that market demand would limit the number of gasoline stations <br />without too much intervention. He says for residents that cannot afford electric <br />vehicles, we cannot just get rid of gasoline stations. He believes this proposal <br />balances the desire to move toward renewal energies yet provides services to <br />those who cannot afford the change yet. This proposal also allows an exemption <br />for future development that attracts new business, employment, and growth. <br />Osterman says she is in support of the ordinance. Two of the most compelling <br />arguments are related to human health concerns and also the economic benefits. <br />Placing a ban does not necessarily reduce the consumption of fossil fuels but <br />there are other compelling reasons for supporting the ban. She is open to the <br />language being strengthened as proposed by some of the citizens. <br />Brauneis says if we are pumping the same amount of gasoline, the chances are <br />that new stations will have fewer emissions. As gasoline stations phase out, the <br />older ones will also phase out. When a gas station closes, they are required to <br />remove the underground storage tanks and remediate the site. He does not find <br />that we are exposed to anything at that point in time. <br />Krantz mentions that the average cost to remediate a gas station is <br />approximately $250,000. It is the most common type of brown field site and ends <br />up being because of petroleum contamination. She does not know how they can <br />justify having more gas stations when car manufactures will stop producing <br />gasoline vehicles in 2035. She discusses a proposed legislation at the state level <br />banning gasoline vehicles and the effects of that. <br />Choi says he drives an electric vehicle for his daily commute but he also has a <br />45-year-old internal combustion vehicle. He would love to electrify his 45-year-old <br />vehicle; he does not have the means to do that right now. There are significant <br />numbers of people who may not have the ability to deal with a gasoline desert. <br />We cannot make a determination only looking at one side of the coin. <br />Brauneis mentions that he wishes they were discussing facilitating support for <br />getting the City to help multi -family housing install charging stations. <br />Krantz says the city ending up with a gasoline desert would be a little bit <br />extreme. If we do approve this, in the petition's language, there was important <br />whereas statements regarding the intent and is stronger than the staff version. <br />Those show the purpose of a gasoline ban or reducing the cap through the years <br />then the whereas statements that staff proposed. Specifically about the electric <br />vehicles. <br />