My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 03 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2023 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 03 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2023 11:24:23 AM
Creation date
3/8/2023 10:31:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
3/8/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />February 8, 2023 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />7. Discussion Item: Introduction of New Staff Members <br />Ember announced two new Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Department staff <br />members and asked them each to introduce themselves to the board. <br />Bryon Weber, Project Manager —Bryon began in January. His desk is physically located <br />in the Public Works office, but he is a Parks and Open Space employee. He will be <br />working on projects across the Department. His background is in urban planning and <br />landscape architecture. He has a list of roughly 70 projects and is currently figuring out <br />how to prioritize them. His first project will be median landscaping, particularly in fire - <br />affected areas, then park and playground improvements, then work on storage at the <br />Golf Course. His first Open Space project will be a trail re -surfacing and regrading <br />project at Coyote Run. He is hoping there will be a RFP for this project released within a <br />week or so. <br />Helen asked if he had been asked to work on wayfinding yet, and Bryon replied that he <br />had not been. <br />Charles asked for more information about the Coyote Run project. Bryon said that the <br />trails need to be leveled and graded so they don't flood or run off, and reassured the <br />concerned board that they would remain crusher fines trails. He said they would also <br />address a few problematic social trails that are causing washouts on the main trail. <br />David asked Bryon for his recommendations about the social trails at Coyote Run and <br />asked him to keep his eye out for that issue. Michiko asked for a definition of social <br />trails and Ember said social trails are trails caused by people going off formal trails, often <br />as short cuts. On Coyote Run, two social trails do damage to the actual trails because <br />they are so steep, causing runoff and washouts. Jessamine said that these Coyote Run <br />social trails might represent a nice test case for dealing with social trails using <br />neighborhood engagement, as they are used almost entirely by locals, which might <br />simplify public outreach. <br />Brendan Close, Senior Natural Resource Specialist —Brendan has a degree in forest <br />and range management from CSU. He has done a lot of work on botanical inventories <br />and management. He is interested in weed control and restoration of natural <br />ecosystems. He previously worked for the City of Westminster. He is working on the <br />Wildfire Hazard & Risk Assessment project. He is also working on getting grazers on <br />city open space land for weed and vegetation control. He added that another benefit of <br />grazers is soil organic material amendment that can improve the water -holding capacity <br />of the soil, which is particularly helpful after a fire that burnt away a lot of the soil organic <br />matter. He pointed out that having grazers on the land is actually quite expensive, as it <br />requires temporary fencing, transportation, herding dogs, and trucking in water for the <br />animals. Ember added that she might come to the board with education materials to get <br />help anticipating citizen concerns about these grazing projects. Susan asked about the <br />success of previous grazing projects at Harper Lake. Ember said one time it was very <br />effective at knocking back weeds and stimulating natives, but one time it was not, though <br />both times the program was popular with locals. She emphasized that this kind of work <br />requires adaptive management (timing the program to match conditions in the field) so <br />she is happy to have Brendan actively leading the project. Brendan cautioned the board <br />to have patience, as prairie restoration work takes around 5 years. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.