My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 04 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2023 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 04 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 10:50:34 AM
Creation date
4/6/2023 9:20:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/12/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />March 8, 2023 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />The pilot program partners with Lafayette. It is limited: only -r10-15 bike rebates will be <br />available in Louisville during this first year. Only Class 1 and 2 E-bikes will be eligible. The <br />rebates will be done at point -of -sale, and worth $300 or $600 (the latter for income -qualified <br />recipients). Community Cycles has suggested their willingness to help with education events <br />about E-bikes. <br />Kayla gave some information about the details of the program, which is still in development. <br />The applications will open on April 3rd. They are working with other income -qualifier agencies, <br />such as SNAP, to help identify people who are income -qualifying for the program. <br />Helen asked what the criteria for selection for the limited number of rebates would be. Kayla <br />said there would be a baseline criterion established by asking applicants about their <br />commitment to replacing car trips, and then all the people who met it would be put in a lottery. <br />Kayla added that there would be an equal number of rebates for income -qualified people and <br />those who don't meet the income -qualified threshold. Several board members commented that <br />the rebates should be reserved entirely for income -qualified individuals. <br />Kayla said some programs require applicants to commit to safe storage for their E-bike, as a <br />means of theft reduction. Charles cautioned that storing E-bikes inside might be a fire hazard, <br />adding that at his company E-bikes were no longer allowed in the building due to an E-bike's <br />battery catching fire. <br />Helen wondered if there was a way to prioritize people with mobility issues. She wondered if a <br />way to select for them might be to see if they are members of the Via Mobility Service. <br />David said he wasn't sure he liked the idea of a pure lottery; he'd rather privilege people who <br />have needs. Kayla said this was helpful feedback. Debbie cautioned about invading people's <br />privacy in invasive questions about income. <br />Susan asked if E-bikes were legal on open space. Ember said that class 1 and class 2 E-bikes, <br />with lower -power motors, the kind that the rebate specifies, are legal on city trails. <br />Michiko asked about things that didn't work well from the Denver program. Kayla said the <br />biggest concerns she heard were about safety and theft. Michiko clarified that she was more <br />concerned about things that didn't work well during the application process. Kayla said she <br />hadn't heard of many, except that the rebates were so popular that people all applied online <br />when they were released and they'd run out in minutes. To address the unfairness of this <br />problem, her plan is to make the application open for a month, then select applicants from the <br />pool of applicants that had been received. Kayla said that if there is a lot more interest than <br />available rebates, the program could help connect people who didn't get the rebate with other <br />programs when they become available. <br />David asked whether there would be any harm in simply waiting for those other programs to <br />come online, rather than Louisville administering its own rebate program. He asked whether the <br />administration cost of this program might outweigh its benefit. Kayla thought the administration <br />costs would be mostly during the front-end planning phase, and then the program would be <br />easy to run. She also thought the local, specific data generated by this program would be <br />useful to the city. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.